Some Basic Concepts of Chemistry
Explanation:
The reaction is $\to$

$C{r_2}{(S{O_4})_3}$ is limiting reagent as ${{2.5} \over 1} < {{11.25} \over 3}$.
$\therefore$ $2.5 - x = 0$
$ \Rightarrow x = 2.5$ milimoles
$\therefore$ Moles of $PbS{O_4}$ formed $ = 3x = 3 \times 2.5 = 7.5 \times {10^{ - 3}}$ moles
After $PbS{O_4}$ precipitate formation in the solution $Pb{(N{O_3})_2}$ and $Cr{(N{O_3})_2}$ remains.
$\therefore$ Milimoles of remaining $Pb{(N{O_3})_2}$ is $ = 11.25 - 3x = 11.25 - 3 \times 2.5 = 3.75$
And milimoles of remaining $Cr{(N{O_3})_2}$ is $ = 2x = 2 \times 2.5 = 5$
$\therefore$ Molar concentration or molarity of $Pb{(N{O_3})_2} = {{3.75 \times {{10}^{ - 3}}} \over {{{45 + 25} \over {1000}}}} = 0.054\,M$
And molarity of $Cr{(N{O_3})_2} = {{5 \times {{10}^{ - 3}}} \over {{{70} \over {1000}}}} = 0.071\,M$
Explanation:
$ 2 \mathrm{NaHCO}_3 \longrightarrow \mathrm{Na}_2 \mathrm{CO}_3+\mathrm{H}_2 \mathrm{O}+\mathrm{CO}_2 $
$ \begin{aligned} \text { Moles of } \mathrm{CO}_2 \text { produced } & =\frac{p V}{R T}=\frac{750}{760} \times \frac{123.9}{1000} \times \frac{1}{0.082 \times 298} \\\\ & =5 \times 10^{-3} \end{aligned} $
$\begin{aligned} & \Rightarrow \text { Moles of } \mathrm{NaHCO}_3 \text { in } 2 \mathrm{~g} \text { sample }=2 \times 5 \times 10^{-3}=0.01 \\\\ & \Rightarrow \text { millimol of } \mathrm{NaHCO}_3 \text { in } 1.5 \mathrm{~g} \text { sample } \\\\ & \qquad=\frac{0.01}{2} \times 1.5 \times 1000=7.5\end{aligned}$
Let the $1.5 \mathrm{~g}$ sample contain $x$ millimol $\mathrm{Na}_2 \mathrm{CO}_3$, then
$ \begin{array}{rlrl} & 2 x+7.5 =\text { millimol of } \mathrm{HCl}=15 \\\\ & \Rightarrow x =3.75 \end{array} $
$\begin{aligned} \Rightarrow \text { Mass of } \mathrm{NaHCO}_3 =\frac{7.5 \times 84}{1000}=0.63 \mathrm{~g} \\\\ \text { Mass of } \mathrm{Na}_2 \mathrm{CO}_3=\frac{3.75 \times 106}{1000}=0.3975 \mathrm{~g}\end{aligned}$
$\begin{aligned} \Rightarrow \% \text { mass of } \mathrm{NaHCO}_3 =\frac{0.63}{1.50} \times 100=42 \% \\\\ \% \text { mass of } \mathrm{Na}_2 \mathrm{CO}_3 =\frac{0.3975}{1.5} \times 100=26.5 \%\end{aligned}$
$\begin{aligned} \% \text { of } \mathrm{Na}_2 \mathrm{SO}_4 \text { in the sample } & =100-(42+26.5) \\\\ & =100-68.5=31.5 \%\end{aligned}$
(Reaction : KIO3 + 2KI + 6HCl $\to$ 3ICl + 3KCl + 3H2O)
Explanation:
First, let's write down the given data for clarity:
- Mass of commercial AgNO3 = 1 g
- Volume of the KI solution used = 50 ml
- Volume of (M/10) KIO3 solution used to titrate excess KI = 50 ml
- Volume of (M/10) KIO3 solution used to titrate 20 ml of KI solution = 30 ml
From the reaction given:
$ KIO_3 + 2KI + 6HCl \to 3ICl + 3KCl + 3H_2O $
It can be seen that 1 mole of KIO3 reacts with 2 moles of KI. The molarity of KIO3 solution is also given as (M/10), which means 0.1 M.
First, let's calculate the moles of KIO3 used to titrate the excess KI present after the precipitation of AgI:
$ \text{Moles of KIO}_3 = \text{Volume} \times \text{Molarity} $
$ = 50 \text{ ml} \times 0.1 \text{ M} $
Since 1 liter is 1000 ml, we convert ml to liters:
$ = \frac{50}{1000} \text{ L} \times \text{0.1 M} $
$ = 0.005 \text{ moles} $
Now, 1 mole of KIO3 reacts with 2 moles of KI; therefore, 0.005 moles of KIO3 will react with:
$ 0.005 \text{ moles KIO}_3 \times 2 \text{ moles KI} / 1 \text{ mole KIO}_3 $
$ = 0.01 \text{ moles KI} $
So, the excess amount of KI after the precipitation of AgI is 0.01 moles.
Next, we need to find out the amount of KI present in the 20 ml of KI solution that reacts with 30 ml of the KIO3 solution.
$ \text{Moles of KIO}_3 (for 20 \text{ ml KI solution}) = \text{Volume} \times \text{Molarity} $
$ = 30 \text{ ml} \times 0.1 \text{ M} $
$ = \frac{30}{1000} \text{ L} \times \text{0.1 M} $
$ = 0.003 \text{ moles KIO}_3 $
This will react with twice the amount of KI:
$ 0.003 \text{ moles KIO}_3 \times 2 \text{ moles KI} / 1 \text{ mole KIO}_3 $
$ = 0.006 \text{ moles KI} $
This amount is present in 20 ml of the KI solution. To find the amount of KI in the initial 50 ml used for the reaction with AgNO3, we set up a proportion, assuming the KI solution is uniform in concentration:
$ \frac{0.006 \text{ moles KI}}{20 \text{ ml}} = \frac{x \text{ moles KI}}{50 \text{ ml}} $
Solving for x:
$ x = \frac{0.006 \text{ moles KI} \times 50 \text{ ml}}{20 \text{ ml}} $
$ x = 0.015 \text{ moles KI} $
From the reaction between AgNO3 and KI:
$ AgNO_3 + KI \to AgI \downarrow + KNO_3 $
You can see that 1 mole of AgNO3 reacts with 1 mole of KI. If 0.01 moles of KI remained after the reaction, the amount of KI that reacted with AgNO3 is:
$ 0.015 \text{ moles KI (total)} - 0.01 \text{ moles KI (excess)} $
$ = 0.005 \text{ moles KI reacted with AgNO}_3 $
Therefore, the moles of AgNO3 in the 1 gram commercial sample is also 0.005 moles, since the molar ratio of AgNO3 to KI is 1:1. Now, let's calculate the mass of 0.005 moles of pure AgNO3:
The molar mass of AgNO3 = Atomic mass of Ag + Atomic mass of N + 3 x Atomic mass of O
= 108 + 14 + 3 x 16 = 170 g/mol
The mass of 0.005 moles of AgNO3 is:
$ 0.005 \text{ moles} \times 170 \text{ g/mol} $
$ = 0.85 \text{ grams} $
Finally, to find the percentage of AgNO3 in the sample, we divide the mass of pure AgNO3 by the mass of the commercial sample and multiply by 100%.
$ \text{Percentage of AgNO}_3 = \frac{0.8493655 \text{ g}}{1 \text{ g}} \times 100\% $
$ = 85\% $
Thus, the sample contains approximately 85 AgNO3.
STATEMENT (S): In the titration of Na2CO3 with HCl using methyl orange indicator, the volume required at the equivalence point is twice that of the acid required using phenolphthalein indicator.
EXPLANATION (E): Two moles of HCl are required for the complete neutralization of one mole of Na2CO3
Find out the molar ratio of Cu2+ to $C_2O_4^{2-}$ in the compound.Write down the balanced redox reactions involved in the above titrations.
Explanation:
To find the weight of $1 \times 10^{22}$ molecules of $\text{CuSO}_4.5\text{H}_2\text{O}$ (Copper(II) sulfate pentahydrate), we will follow several steps, including understanding the molar mass of the compound, Avogadro's number, and how to use these to find the mass of the given number of molecules.
First, let's calculate the molar mass of $\text{CuSO}_4.5\text{H}_2\text{O}$:
- Copper (Cu) = $63.55 \, \text{g/mol}$
- Sulfur (S) = $32.07 \, \text{g/mol}$
- Oxygen (O) = $16.00 \, \text{g/mol}$
- Hydrogen (H) = $1.008 \, \text{g/mol}$
The molar mass of $\text{CuSO}_4.5\text{H}_2\text{O}$ is calculated as follows:
$M = (\text{Cu}) + (\text{S}) + 4(\text{O}) + 5[(2(\text{H})) + (\text{O})] = 63.55 + 32.07 + 4(16.00) + 5[2(1.008) + 16.00] = 63.55 + 32.07 + 64.00 + 5(2.016 + 16.00) = 63.55 + 32.07 + 64.00 + 5(18.016) = 159.62 + 90.08 = 249.7 \, \text{g/mol}$
Now, knowing that Avogadro's number ($N_A$) is $6.022 \times 10^{23}$ molecules/mol, which represents the number of molecules in one mole of any substance, we can find the mass of $1 \times 10^{22}$ molecules of $\text{CuSO}_4.5\text{H}_2\text{O}$ using the proportion:
$\frac{1 \times 10^{22} \, \text{molecules}}{x \, \text{g}} = \frac{6.022 \times 10^{23} \, \text{molecules}}{249.7 \, \text{g}}$
Solving for $x$ gives us the mass of the $1 \times 10^{22}$ molecules:
$x = \frac{1 \times 10^{22} \, \text{molecules} \times 249.7 \, \text{g}}{6.022 \times 10^{23} \, \text{molecules}} = \frac{249.7}{6.022} \times 10^{-1} \approx 41.45 \times 10^{-1} \, \text{g} = 4.145 \, \text{g}$
Therefore, the weight of $1 \times 10^{22}$ molecules of $\text{CuSO}_4.5\text{H}_2\text{O}$ is approximately $4.145 \, \text{g}$.
Explanation:
93% ${H_2}S{O_4}$ solution weight by volume means in 100 ml solution 93 gm ${H_2}S{O_4}$ present.
Density of solution = 1.84 g/mL
$\therefore$ Weight of solution = 100 $\times$ 1.84 = 184 gm
$\therefore$ Weight of solvent ${H_2}O$ = 184 $-$ 93 = 91 gm
Now,
$\mathrm{Molality ={{Moles\,of\,solute} \over {Weight\,of\,solvent\,in\,Kg}}}$
$ = {{{{93} \over {98}}} \over {{{91} \over {1000}}}} = 10.42$
Explanation:
Note : 
Let, weight of $Pb{(N{O_3})_2}$ in the mixture = x gm
Then weight of $NaN{O_3}$ in the mixture $ = (5 - x)$ gm
$\therefore$ Moles of $Pb{(N{O_3})_2} = {x \over {332}}$
and moles of $NaN{O_3} = {{5 - x} \over {85}}$
$\therefore$ Moles of $PbO = {x \over {332}}$
and moles of $NaN{O_2} = {{5 - x} \over {85}}$
Loss in weight happens as gaseous substance removed from the mixture.
$\therefore$ Weight of residue $PbO$ and $NaN{O_2} = 100 - 28 = 72\% $
$\therefore$ Weight of residue $ = 5 \times {{72} \over {100}} = 3.6$ gm
$\therefore$ Weight of $PbO$ + Weight of $NaN{O_2} = 3.6$
$ \Rightarrow {x \over {332}} \times 224 + {{5 - x} \over {85}} \times 69 = 3.6$
$ \Rightarrow 224x + (5 - x) \times 69 \times 332 = 3.6 \times 85 \times 332$
$ \Rightarrow x = 3.324$ g
$\therefore$ Weight of $Pb{(N{O_3})_2} = 3.324$ gm
$\therefore$ Weight of $NaN{O_3} = 5 - 3.324 = 1.676$ gm
Explanation:
Weight of sugar syrup = 214.2 gm
Weight of solute sugar = 34.2 gm
$\therefore$ Weight of solvent (H2O) = 214.2 $-$ 34.2 = 180 gm
(i) Molal concentration or molality
$ = {{Number\,of\,moles\,of\,solute} \over {Weight\,of\,solvent\,in\,kg}}$
$ = {{{{34.2} \over {342}}} \over {{{180} \over {1000}}}}$
$ = {{100} \over {180}} = 0.56$
(ii) Mole fraction of sugar
$ = {{{{34.2} \over {342}}} \over {{{34.2} \over {342}} + {{180} \over {18}}}}$
$ = {{0.1} \over {0.1 + 10}}$
$ = {{0.1} \over {10.1}} = 0.0099$
Reaction:
4Fe3+ + N2H4 $\to$ N2 + 4Fe2+ + 4H+
$MnO_4^-$ + 4Fe2+ + 8H+ $\to$ Mn2+ + 5Fe3+ + 4H2O
Explanation:
On heating, we have XCO3 $\to$ XO + CO2
The loss of mass (= 4.08 g $-$ 3.64 g = 0.44 g) is due to the removal of CO2. Thus
Amount of CO2 released = ${{0.44g} \over {44\,g\,mo{l^{ - 1}}}}$ = 10$-$2 mol
Hence, Amount of XO = 10$-$2 mol
Now, mass of BaO in the mixture after heating = 3.64 g $-$ (10$-$2 mol) (MXO)
= 3.64 g $-$ (10$-$2 mol) (MX + 16 g mol$-$1)
= 3.48 g $-$ (10$-$2 mol) (MX)
From the dissolution reactions
BaO + 2HCl $\to$ BaCl2 + H2O
XO + 2HCl $\to$ XCl2 + H2O
We conclude that
Amount of HCl consumed for the dissolution process = $2\left[ {{{3.48g - ({{10}^{ - 2}}mol){M_X}} \over {{M_{BaO}}}} + {{10}^{ - 2}}mol} \right]$
Amount of HCl taken for the dissolution process = (100 mL) (0.1 M) = $\left( {{{100} \over {1000}}L} \right)$ (1 mol L$-$1) = 0.1 mol
Amount of remaining HCl = 0.1 mol $-$ $2\left[ {{{3.48g - ({{10}^{ - 2}}mol){M_X}} \over {154g\,mo{l^{ - 1}}}} + {{10}^{ - 2}}mol} \right]$
Since the remaining HCl required 16 mL of 2.5 M NaOH $\left( { = {{16} \over {1000}} \times 2.5\,mol} \right)$ for complete neutralization, we would have
${{{16 \times 2.5} \over {1000}}}$ mol = 0.1 mol $-$ 2 $\left[ {{{3.48g - ({{10}^{ - 2}}mol){M_X}} \over {154g\,mo{l^{ - 1}}}} + {{10}^{ - 2}}mol} \right]$
This gives ${M_X} = {{\left( {{{16 \times 2.5} \over {1000}} - 0.1 + 2 \times {{10}^{ - 2}}} \right)\left( {{{154} \over 2}} \right)g + 3.48g} \over {({{10}^{ - 2}}\,mol)}}$ = 40 g mol$-$1
Hence, the element X is Ca.
(i) the percentage by weight of sodium thiosulphate,
(ii) the mole fraction of sodium thiosulphate and
(iii) the molalities of Na+ and $S_2O_3^{-2}$ ions
Explanation:
3 M Na2S2O3 solution means 3 moles of Na2S2O3 present in 1 litre of solution.
$\therefore$ Volume of solution = 1 litre = 1000 ml
Density of solution = 1.25 g/ml
$\therefore$ Mass of solution = 1000 $\times$ 1.25 = 1250 gm
Molar mass of Na2S2O3 = 158 gm
$\therefore$ Weight of solute Na2S2O3 = 3 $\times$ 158 = 474 gm
$\therefore$ Weight of water = 1250 $-$ 474 = 776 gm
(i) % weight of $N{a_2}{S_2}{O_3} = {{Weight\,of\,N{a_2}{S_2}{O_3}} \over {Weight\,of\,solution}} \times 100$
$ = {{474} \over {1250}} \times 100$
$ = 37.92$
(ii) Mole fraction of $N{a_2}{S_2}{O_3} = {{Moles\,of\,N{a_2}{S_2}{O_3}} \over {Moles\,of\,N{a_2}{S_2}{O_3} + Moles\,of\,{H_2}O}}$
$ = {3 \over {3 + {{776} \over {18}}}}$
$ = 0.065$
(iii) Molality of solution (m) $ = {{Moles\,of\,solute} \over {Weight\,of\,solvent\,in\,kg}}$
$\therefore$ $m = {3 \over {{{776} \over {1000}}}}$
$ = 3.865$
$N{a_2}{S_2}{O_3}\buildrel {} \over \longrightarrow 2N{a^ + } + {S_2}O_3^{ - 2}$
$\therefore$ Molality of $N{a^ + } = 2 \times 3.865 = 7.732$
and Molality of ${S_2}O_3^{ - 2} = 3.865$
Explanation:
To find the molality of the solution, we'll first understand the definition. Molality ($m$) is defined as the number of moles of solute per kilogram of solvent. The formula for molality is:
$m = \frac{\text{moles of solute}}{\text{kg of solvent}}$
Given that the mass of the salt is 3 g and its molecular weight is 30 g/mol, we can calculate the moles of solute (salt) using the formula:
$ \text{moles of solute} = \frac{\text{mass of solute}}{\text{molecular weight of solute}} $
$ \text{moles of salt} = \frac{3 \, \text{g}}{30 \, \text{g/mol}} $
$ \text{moles of salt} = 0.1 \, \text{mol} $
We also have 250 g of water as the solvent. Since molality requires the mass of the solvent to be in kilograms, we convert the mass of water to kilograms:
$ 250 \, \text{g} = 0.250 \, \text{kg} $
Now, we can substitute the values into the molality formula:
$ m = \frac{0.1 \, \text{mol}}{0.250 \, \text{kg}} $
$ m = 0.4 \, \text{mol/kg} $
Therefore, the molality of the solution is $0.4 \, \text{mol/kg}$.
2NH2OH + 4Fe3+ $\to$ N2O(g) $ \uparrow $ + H2O + 4Fe2+ + 4H+
Iron (II) thus produced is estimated by titration with a standard permanganate solution. The reaction is :
$MnO_4^-$ + 5Fe2+ + 8H+ $\to$ Mn2+ + 5Fe3+ + 4H2O
A 10 ml sample of hydroxylamine solution was Diluted to 1 litre. 50 ml of this diluted solution was boiled with an excess of iron (III) solution. The resulting solution required 12 ml of 0.02 M KMnO4 solution for complete oxidation of iron (II). Calculate the weight of hydroxylamine in one litre of the original solution. (H = 1, N = 14, O = 16, K =39, Mn = 55, Fe = 56)
Explanation:
From the given chemical equations, we find that
2 mol of NH2OH $\equiv$ 4 mol Fe2+ and 1 mol MnO$_4^ - $ $\equiv$ 5 mol Fe2+
Amount of MnO$_4^ - $ consumed in the oxidation of iron (H)
V M = (12 mL) (0.02 M) = $\left( {{{12} \over {1000}}L} \right)$ (0.02 mol L$-$1) = ${{12 \times 0.02} \over {1000}}$ mol
Since 1 mol MnO$_4^ - $ $\equiv$ 5 mol Fe2+, we have
Amount of Fe2+ formed by the reduction of Fe3+ by NH2OH = (5) $\left( {{{12 \times 0.02} \over {1000}}} \right)$ mol
Now since 2 mol NH2OH $\equiv$ 4 mol Fe2+, we have
Amount of NH2OH present in 50 mL of diluted solution = $\left( {{2 \over 4}} \right)(5)\left( {{{12 \times 0.02} \over {1000}}} \right)$ mol
Amount of NH2OH present in 1 L of diluted solution = $\left( {{{1000} \over {50}}} \right)\left( {{2 \over 4}} \right)(5)\left( {{{12 \times 0.02} \over {1000}}} \right)$ mol
Amount of NH2OH present in 1 L of undiluted solution = $\left( {{{1000} \over {10}}} \right)\left( {{{1000} \over {50}}} \right)\left( {{2 \over 4}} \right)(5)\left( {{{12 \times 0.02} \over {1000}}} \right)$ mol = 1.2 mol
Mass of NH2OH present in 1 L of undiluted solution = (1.2 mol) (33 g mol$-$1) = 39.6 g.
Explanation:
The equations involved are
$MnO_4^ - + 8{H^ + } + 5{e^ - } \to M{n^{2 + }} + 4{H_2}O] \times 2$
${H_2}{O_2} \to {O_2} + 2{H^ + } + 2{e^ - }] \times 5$
$2MnO_4^ - + 5{H_2}{O_2} + 6{H^ + } \to 2M{n^{2 + }} + 5{O_2} + 8{H_2}O$
From this equation, we find that
Equivalent mass of ${H_2}{O_2},\,{M_{eq}} = {{Molar\,mass\,of\,{H_2}{O_2}} \over {2\,eq\,mo{l^{ - 1}}}} = {{34g\,mo{l^{ - 1}}} \over {2\,eq\,mo{l^{ - 1}}}} = 17\,g\,e{q^{ - 1}}$
Mass of H2O2 in the given 1.0 g sample, ${m_{eq}} = {X \over {100}} \times 1.0\,g$
Amount (in equivalents) of H2O2 in the given 1.0 g sample is
${n_{eq}} = {m \over {{M_{eq}}}} = {{(X/100)g} \over {17\,g\,e{q^{ - 1}}}} = {X \over {17 \times 100}}eq$
If NKMnO4 is the normality of KMnO4, the amount (in equivalents) of KMnO4 consumed is
$n{'_{eq}} = {V_{KMn{O_4}}}\,{N_{KMn{O_4}}} = \left( {{X \over {1000}}L} \right){N_{KMn{O_4}}}$
Equating Eqs (1) and (2), we get
$\left( {{X \over {1000}}L} \right){N_{KMn{O_4}}} = {X \over {17 \times 100}}eq$
or, ${N_{KMn{O_4}}} = {{10} \over {17}}eq\,{L^{ - 1}} = 0.588\,eq\,{L^{ - 1}}$
(i) The total number of neutrons and
(ii) The total mass of neutron in 7 mg of 14C
(Assume that mass of neutron = mass of hydrogen atom)
(a) 1 litre of a mixture of CO and CO2 is taken. This mixture is passed through a tube containing red hot charcoal. The volume now becomes 1.6 litre. The volumes are measured under the same conditions. Find the composition of the mixture by volume.
(b) A compound contains 28 percent of nitrogen and 72 percent of metal by weight. 3 atoms of metal combine with 2 atoms of N. Find the atomic weight of metal.
Explanation:
(a) Volume of mixture of CO and CO2 = 1 L
Let volume of $C{O_2} = V\,L$
$\therefore$ Volume of $CO = (1 - V)\,L$
Now mixture is passed through red hot charcoal.
$\therefore$ Reaction is :

Volume only count for gases for the reaction involving gases. That is why volume of solid C is not counted.
After reaction completed volume becomes = 1.6 L
$\therefore$ $1 + V = 1.6$
$ \Rightarrow V = 0.6$
$\therefore$ Volume of CO2 in the mixture = 0.6 L and volume of CO = $ = 1 - 0.6 = 0.4\,L$.
$\therefore$ 60% CO2 and 40% CO.
(b) We know,
% of any element $ = {{Weight\,of\,element} \over {Molar\,mass\,of\,compound}} \times 100$
Let, atomic mass of metal M = A
Given compound contains 28% nitrogen.
And 3 atom of metal combine with 2 atoms of nitrogen.
$\therefore$ $28 = {{14 \times 2} \over {3A + 14 \times 2}} \times 100$
$ \Rightarrow 3A + 28 = 100$
$ \Rightarrow 3A = 72$
$ \Rightarrow A = 24$
$\therefore$ Atomic weight of metal = 24
$\therefore$ Metal is = Mg
$3Mg + {N_2} \to M{g_3}{N_2}$
(b) A sample of hard water contains 20 mg of Ca++ ions per litre. How many milli-equivalent of Na2CO3 would be required to soften 1 litre of the sample?
(c) 1 gm of Mg is burnt in a closed vessel which contains 0.5gm of O2.
(i) Which reactant is left in excess?
(ii) Find the weight of the excess reactants.
(iii) How many milliliters of 0.5N H2SO4 will dissolve the residue in the vessel?
Explanation:

111 mg CaCl2 will give CaCO3 = 100 mg
1 mg CaCl2 will give CaCO3 = ${{100} \over {111}}$ mg
Similarly,
1 mg MgCl2 will give $CaC{O_3} = {{100} \over {95}}$ mg
Total CaCO3 formed due to 1 mg CaCl2 and 1 mg of MgCl2
$ = {{100} \over {111}} + {{100} \over {95}}$ mg = 2 mg
CaCO3 per litre of water = 2 mg
Weight of 1 ml of water = 1 g = 103 mg
Weight of 1000 ml of water = 103 $\times$ 103 mg = 106 mg
2 mg of CaCO3 is present in 106 mg of water.
or 2 parts of CaCO3 in 106 part of water.
(b) $C{a^{2 + }} + N{a_2}C{O_3} \to CaC{O_3} + 2N{a^ + }$
Equivalent weight of $C{a^{2 + }} = {{40} \over 2} = 20$
1 milliequivalent of Ca2+ = 20 mg
1 milliequi. of Ca2+ = 1 millieq. of Na2CO3
$\therefore$ 1 milliequivalent of Na2CO3 is required to soften 1 litre of hard water.
(c) Magnesium burns in O2 to form MgO. The reaction involved is:
$\mathop {2\,mg}\limits_{2 \times 24 = 48\,g} + \mathop {{O_2}}\limits_{32\,g} \to \mathop {2MgO}\limits_{2[24 + 16] = 80\,g} $
(i) According to the above equation, 48 g Mg requires O2 = 32g
1 g Mg requires O2 = ${{32} \over {48}}$ g = 0.66 g
Since the oxygen available is only 0.50 g, so whole of magnesium will not burn. Thus magnesium is in excess.
(ii) Again from the balanced equation, 32 g O2 reacts with magnesium = 48 g
0.5 g O2 reacts with magnesium
$ = {{48} \over {32}} \times 0.5 = 0.75$ g
Hence, weight of magnesium in excess
= (1.0 $-$ 0.75) = 0.25 g
(iii) Unused magnesium dissolves in H2SO4 according to the following equation:
$\mathop {Mg}\limits_{24\,g} + \mathop {{H_2}S{O_4}}\limits_{98\,g} \to MgS{O_4} + {H_2}$
$\therefore$ H2SO4 required to dissolve 0.25 g Mg
$ = {{98} \over {24}} \times 0.25 = 1.021\,g$
MgO formed dissolves in H2SO4 according to the following equation:
$\mathop {MgO}\limits_{24 + 16 = 40\,g} + \mathop {{H_2}S{O_4}}\limits_{98\,g} \to MgS{O_4} + {H_2}O$
MgO formed from 0.75
$Mg = {{80} \over {48}} \times 0.75 = 1.25\,g$
H2SO4 required to dissolve 1.25 g MgO
$ = {{98} \over {40}} \times 1.25 = 3.062\,g$
Total weight of H2SO4 required to dissolve the residue = 1.021 + 3.062 = 4.083 g
Strength of given
H2SO4 = Normality $\times$ Eq. wt.
= 0.5 $\times$ 49 = 24.5 g L$-$1
Hence, 24.5 g H2SO4 is present in 1000 mL 4.083 g H2SO4 is present in
$ = {{1000} \over {24.5}} \times 4.083$ mL = 166.65 mL
(ii). The residue is dissolved in 100 ml of 0.1N FeSO4 containing dilute H2SO4.
(iii). The solution reacts completely with 50 ml of KMnO4 solution.
(iv). 25 ml of the KMnO4 solution used in step (iii) requires 30 ml of 0.1 N FeSO4 solution for complete reaction.
Find the amount of MnSO4.4H2O present in the sample.
Explanation:
To find the amount of $ \text{MnSO}_4\cdot4\text{H}_2\text{O} $ present in the sample, we can follow the steps below, applying stoichiometry and the principle of equivalence in titration. Let's analyze each step to solve this problem:
Step (i): Heating MnSO4.4H2OWhen $ \text{MnSO}_4\cdot4\text{H}_2\text{O} $ is strongly heated, it decomposes, and the end product mentioned is $ \text{Mn}_3\text{O}_4 $. The chemical equation for the decomposition isn't provided directly, but it's crucial to know that we end up with $ \text{Mn}_3\text{O}_4 $ which indicates the reduction of the sulfate.
Step (ii): Dissolving the residue in FeSO4 solutionThe $ \text{Mn}_3\text{O}_4 $ residue reacts with $ \text{FeSO}_4 $ in the presence of dilute $ \text{H}_2\text{SO}_4 $. Here, $ \text{Fe}^{2+} $ acts as a reducing agent.
Step (iii): Reaction with KMnO4The solution from step (ii) completely reacts with $ \text{KMnO}_4 $, using 50 ml of $ \text{KMnO}_4 $ solution.
Step (iv): KMnO4 solution titrationHere, we learn that 25 ml of the $ \text{KMnO}_4 $ solution require 30 ml of 0.1 N $ \text{FeSO}_4 $ for complete reaction. This gives us a direct relationship to calculate the normality (and thus the molarity) of the $ \text{KMnO}_4 $ solution.
To find the normality of the $ \text{KMnO}_4 $ solution, we use:
$ V_1N_1 = V_2N_2 $
where,
- $ V_1 $ is the volume of $ \text{FeSO}_4 $ (30 ml),
- $ N_1 $ is the normality of $ \text{FeSO}_4 $ (0.1 N),
- $ V_2 $ is the volume of $ \text{KMnO}_4 $ (25 ml),
- $ N_2 $ is the normality of $ \text{KMnO}_4 $, which we will calculate.
$ 30 \times 0.1 = 25 \times N_2 $
$ N_2 = \frac{30 \times 0.1}{25} = \frac{3}{25} = 0.12\, \text{N} $
Now, knowing that 50 ml of $ \text{KMnO}_4 $ reacts with the $ \text{Mn}_3\text{O}_4 $ formed from the original $ \text{MnSO}_4\cdot4\text{H}_2\text{O} $, and since 25 ml of $ \text{KMnO}_4 $ is 0.12 N, 50 ml of $ \text{KMnO}_4 $ is equivalent to 60 ml of 0.1 N $ \text{FeSO}_4 $. This equivalence helps us understand the amount of $ \text{Fe}^{2+} $ that would react with the $ \text{Mn}^{2+} $ from the original sample.
Given that 60 ml of 0.1 N $ \text{FeSO}_4 $ is used in total, and knowing that 1 mole of $ \text{MnSO}_4 $ reacts to eventually form $ \text{Mn}_3\text{O}_4 $ and is equivalent to the reaction of $ \text{Fe}^{2+} $ with $ \text{KMnO}_4 $, we can calculate the moles of $ \text{MnSO}_4 $ initially present.
$ \text{Moles of } \text{Fe}^{2+} = V \times N = 60 \times 0.1 \times 10^{-3} \text{ L} \times \text{N} = 6 \times 10^{-3} \text{ moles} $
Given the molar ratio of $ \text{Fe}^{2+} $ to $ \text{MnSO}_4 $ in the reactions (which can vary based on the specific reactions involved but typically could be 1:1 in redox reactions involving manganate and iron(II) ions in acidic solution), we can assume that the moles of $ \text{Fe}^{2+} $ directly give us the moles of $ \text{MnSO}_4 $ initially present because each $ \text{Fe}^{2+} $ ion reduces a $ \text{MnO}_4^- $ ion, and the $ \text{Mn}_3\text{O}_4 $ would be linked back to the $ \text{MnSO}_4 $ based on the stoichiometry not given.
Thus, the amount of $ \text{MnSO}_4\cdot4\text{H}_2\text{O} $ present initially can be approximated if we know its molecular weight:
$ \text{MW of } \text{MnSO}_4\cdot4\text{H}_2\text{O} = 151.00 + (4 \times 18.015) = 151.00 + 72.06 = 223.06 \, \text{g/mol} $
Therefore, the mass of $ \text{MnSO}_4\cdot4\text{H}_2\text{O} $ is:
$ \text{Mass} = 6 \times 10^{-3} \text{ moles} \times 223.06 \, \text{g/mol} = 1.33836 \, \text{g} $
In this way, we find that the sample originally contains approximately $ 1.34 $ g of $ \text{MnSO}_4\cdot4\text{H}_2\text{O} $. This calculation is based on an understanding of the stoichiometry of the reactions involved and the titration data. Some assumptions had to be made due to missing precise chemical equations, especially in the conversion between $ \text{MnSO}_4\cdot4\text{H}_2\text{O} $ to $ \text{Mn}_3\text{O}_4 $, and how it reacts with $ \text{KMnO}_4 $ and $ \text{FeSO}_4 $.
(i) 1g of this is dissolved in water. Excess of acidified AgNO3 solution is added to it. 2.567 g of white ppt is formed.
(ii) 1 g of original mixture is heated to 300oC. Some vapours come out which are absorbed in acidified AgNO3 solution, 1.341 g of white precipitate was obtained.
Find the molecular weight of unknown chloride.
Explanation:
To find the total number of electrons in 18 ml of water, we need to follow a series of steps involving concepts from chemistry, particularly Avogadro's number and the composition of water molecules.
First, let's determine the number of moles of water in 18 ml. The density of water is approximately 1 g/ml, so 18 ml of water would have a mass of 18 grams.
The molar mass of water (H2O) is 18 g/mol (approximately 1 g/mol for Hydrogen and 16 g/mol for Oxygen, hence 2*1 + 16 = 18 g/mol). To calculate the number of moles of water, we use the formula:
$\text{moles of water} = \frac{\text{mass of water}}{\text{molar mass of water}}$
Substituting the given values:
$\text{moles of water} = \frac{18 \text{ g}}{18 \text{ g/mol}} = 1 \text{ mol}$
Now, each water molecule contains 10 electrons (2 in each hydrogen atom and 6 in the oxygen atom).
To find the total number of electrons in all the water molecules, we multiply the number of moles of water by Avogadro's number (which is approximately $6.022 \times 10^{23}$ mol−1) to get the number of molecules, then multiply that by the number of electrons per molecule:
$\text{Total electrons} = \text{moles of water} \times \text{Avogadro's number} \times \text{electrons per molecule}$
Substituting the values we know:
$\text{Total electrons} = 1 \text{ mol} \times 6.022 \times 10^{23} \text{ mol}^{-1} \times 10$
$\text{Total electrons} = 6.022 \times 10^{24}$
Therefore, there are $6.022 \times 10^{24}$ electrons in 18 ml of water.
Explanation:
The modern atomic unit is based on the mass of carbon-12. Specifically, it is defined as one twelfth of the mass of a carbon-12 atom in its ground state. This unit of mass is known as the unified atomic mass unit (u) or dalton (Da). Thus, the atomic mass of carbon-12 is exactly 12 u by definition. This standard provides a convenient way for scientists to compare the masses of different atoms and molecules, as it is based on a specific, widely available atom.
Explanation:
Volume of CO2 evolved = 1336 mL, Temperature = 273 + 27 = 300 K, Pressure = 700 mm
Converting the volume of CO2 to volume at STP by using the gas equation,
${{{P_1}{V_1}} \over {{T_1}}} = {{{P_2}{V_2}} \over {{T_2}}}$ ; ${{700 \times 1336} \over {300}} = {{760 \times V} \over {273}}$
V = 1120 mL
Where V is the volume of CO2 at STP.
Now, 22400 mL of CO2 at STP weigh = Gram mol. wt. of CO2 = 44 g
$\therefore$ 1120 mL of CO2 at STP weigh
$ = {{44} \over {22400}} \times 1120 = 2.20$ g
Weight of metal carbonate = 4.215 g
Weight of CO2 evolved = 2.20 g
Weight of metal oxide left after evolution of CO2 gas = 4.215 $-$ 2.20 = 2.015 g
If equivalent weight of metal is E then using the relation:
${{Weight\,of\,metal\,carbonate} \over {weight\,of\,metal\,oxide}}$
$ = {{E + Eq.\,wt.\,of\,C{O_3}^{2 - }} \over {E + Eq.\,wt.\,of\,{O^{2 - }}}}$
Substituting values ${{4.215} \over {2.015}} = {{E + 30} \over {E + 8}}$ [$\because$ Eq. wt. of $C{O_3}^{2 - } = {{60} \over 2} = 30$]
On solving, E = 12.15
Explanation:
Let,
We have x gm of $N{a_2}O$ and y gm of ${K_2}O$ in 0.5 gm of feldspar.

$\therefore$ Total NaCl obtained $ = {x \over {62}} \times 2 \times 58.5$ gm
and total KCl obtained $ = {y \over {94}} \times 2 \times 74.5$
According to the question,
${x \over {31}} \times 58.5 + {y \over {47}} \times 74.5 = 0.118$
$ \Rightarrow 1.887x + 1.585y = 0.118$ ....... (1)
Now, 2nd part of the reaction happens

Similarly,

$\therefore$ Total moles of AgCl produced
$ = \left( {{x \over {31}} + {y \over {47}}} \right)$ moles
Molecular weight of AgCl = 108 + 35.5 = 143.5
Weight of $AgCl = \left( {{x \over {31}} + {y \over {47}}} \right) \times 143.5$
According to the question,
$\left( {{x \over {31}} + {y \over {47}}} \right) \times 143.5 = 0.2451$
$ \Rightarrow 4.63x + 3.053y = 0.2451$ ....... (2)
Solving equation (1) and (2), we get
$x = 0.0179$ gm
and $y = 0.0531$ gm
$\therefore$ % of $N{a_2}O$ in 0.5 g of feldspar $ = {{0.0179} \over {0.5}} \times 100 = 3.58\% $
and % of ${K_2}O$ in 0.5 of feldspar $ = {{0.0531} \over {0.5}} \times 100 = 10.62\% $
Explanation:

After explosion volume of mixed remain gas of ${V_{{O_2}}} + {V_{C{O_2}}} = 25$ ml
$\therefore$ $30 - 5\left( {x + {y \over 4}} \right) + 5x = 25$
$ \Rightarrow 30 - 5x - {{5y} \over 4} + 5x = 25$
$ \Rightarrow 30 - {{5y} \over 4} = 25$
$ \Rightarrow {{5y} \over 4} = 5$
$ \Rightarrow y = 4$
Now $KOH$ is added to the mixture. As $KOH$ is basic nature so it will absorb $C{O_2}$. After adding $KOH$ volume reduce to 15 ml from 25 ml.
$\therefore$ Absorbed $C{O_2}$ by $KOH$ $ = 25 - 15 = 10$ ml
$\therefore$ $5x = 10$
$ \Rightarrow x = 2$
$\therefore$ Molecular Formula of hydrocarbon gas $ = {C_2}{H_4}$
(b). The vapour density (hydrogen = 1) of a mixture consisting of NO2 and N2O4 is 38.3 at 26.7oC. Calculate the number of moles of NO2 in 100 g of the mixure.
Explanation:
We know,
Vapour density of single was $ = {{\mathrm{Molar\,Mass}} \over 2}$
and Vapour density (VD) of mixture of gas $ = {{\mathrm{Average\,Molar\,Mass\,({M_{avg}}})} \over 2}$
Here mixture of NO2 and N2O4 gas present.
$\therefore$ $\mathrm{VD} = {{{\mathrm{M_{avg}}}} \over 2}$
Given, $VD = 38.3$
$\therefore$ $38.3 = {{{\mathrm{M_{avg}}}} \over 2}$
$ \Rightarrow {\mathrm{M_{avg}}} = 76.6$
Now let in 100 gm of mixture there are x gm of NO2.
And molecular mass of $N{O_2} = 14 + 32 = 46$
And let weight of N2O4 in 100 gm of mixture $ = 100 - x$
And molecular mass of ${N_2}{O_4} = 14 \times 2 + 16 \times = 92$
$\therefore$ Molos of $N{O_2} = {x \over {46}}$
and moles of ${N_2}{O_4} = {{100 - x} \over {92}}$
We know,
Number of moles $(n) = {{\mathrm{Given\,Mass\,(W)}} \over {\mathrm{Molar\,Mass\,(M)}}}$
$ \Rightarrow M = {W \over n}$
Given, $M = 76.6$
$W = 100$ gm
$n = {x \over {46}} + {{100 - x} \over {92}}$
$ \Rightarrow 76.6 = {{100} \over {{x \over {46}} + {{100 - x} \over {92}}}}$
$ \Rightarrow {x \over {46}} + {{100 - x} \over {92}} = {{100} \over {76.6}}$
$ \Rightarrow {{2x + 100 - x} \over {92}} = {{100} \over {76.6}}$
$ \Rightarrow x + 100 = {{9200} \over {76.6}}$
$ \Rightarrow 76.6x + 7660 = 9200$
$ \Rightarrow 76.6x = 1540$
$ \Rightarrow x = {{1540} \over {76.6}} = 20.1$
$\therefore$ Weight of $N{O_2} = 20.1$ g
and weight of ${N_2}{O_4} = 79.9$ g
$\therefore$ Moles of $N{O_2} = {{20.1} \over {46}} = 0.437$ moles
Account for the following : Limit your answer to two sentences.
"Atomic weights of most of the elements are fractional."
Explanation:
Most of the naturally occurring elements occurs in the form of isotopes and if different isotopes present in the element are significant in quantity then by calculating their weighted average we get fractional atomic weight.
Note that in question it is given that most of the element's atomic weight is fractional not all elements. Because for example atomic weight of Cl = 35.5 which is fractional but atomic weight of C = 12 which is integer. That is why we can't say all element's atomic weight is fractional. The reason is explained below $\to$
Naturally available two isotopes of Cl are 75% ${}_{17}C{l^{35}}$ and 25% ${}_{17}C{l^{37}}$ . Here both isotopes are significantly present inside Cl. So their weighted average depends on both the isotopes. And by calculating we find atomic weight of Cl = 35.5 (It is a fraction). There are 3 main naturally available isotopes of Carbon (1) 98.9% ${}_6{C^{12}}$ (2) 1.1% ${}_6{C^{13}}$ and (3) 0.0001% ${}_6{C^{14}}$ . As ${}_6{C^{13}}$ and ${}_6{C^{14}}$ are negligible compared to ${}_6{C^{12}}$ . So their weighted average depends on only ${}_6{C^{12}}$ . By calculating we find atomic weight of C = 12.0107 $\simeq$ 12 (integer)
Explanation:
To determine the weight of AgCl that will be precipitated when a solution containing 4.77 g of NaCl is mixed with a solution of 5.77 g of AgNO3, we employ stoichiometry. The reaction between NaCl and AgNO3 is as follows:
$ \text{NaCl}_{(aq)} + \text{AgNO}_{3_{(aq)}} \rightarrow \text{AgCl}_{(s)} + \text{NaNO}_{3_{(aq)}} $
From the equation, you can see the reaction proceeds on a 1:1 molar basis for both NaCl and AgNO3 to AgCl.
To start, we determine the moles of NaCl and AgNO3 using their respective molar masses (NaCl = 58.44 g/mol, AgNO3 = 169.87 g/mol):
$ \text{Moles of NaCl} = \frac{4.77}{58.44} \approx 0.0816 \text{ mol} $
$ \text{Moles of AgNO}_{3} = \frac{5.77}{169.87} \approx 0.0340 \text{ mol} $
Since NaCl is in excess (0.0816 mol > 0.0340 mol of AgNO3), the limiting reagent is AgNO3. So, the amount of AgCl formed is directly proportional to the amount of AgNO3 present.
Now, we calculate the mass of AgCl formed. AgCl has a molar mass of approximately 143.32 g/mol (Ag = 107.87 g/mol + Cl = 35.45 g/mol). Given that 0.0340 mol of AgNO3 will react to form the same amount of AgCl (because of the 1:1 mole ratio), the mass of AgCl produced is:
$ \text{Mass of AgCl} = 0.0340 \, \text{mol} \times 143.32 \, \text{g/mol} \approx 4.873 \, \text{g} $
Therefore, approximately 4.873 g of AgCl will be precipitated when a solution containing 4.77 g of NaCl is added to a solution of 5.77 g of AgNO3.
Explanation:
1st Part : Volume of 100 g of 13% H2SO4 solution = ${{100} \over {1.02}}$ mL = 98.04 mL
13 g of H2SO4 $\equiv$ ${{13} \over {98}}$ $\equiv$ 0.1326 mol of H2SO4
$\therefore$ 98.04 mL solution contains 0.1326 mol of H2SO4.
Hence, molarity of the solution = ${{0.1326} \over {98.04}} \times 1000$ = 1.35 mol L$-$1
Again, molality (m) = ${{Mass\,of\,the\,solute \div \,Molar\,mass} \over {Mass\,of\,the\,solvent}} \times 1000$
Now, 13% solution of H2SO4 means that 13g of H2SO4 is dissolved in 87g of solvent.
Thus, molality = ${{13/98} \over {87}} \times 1000 = {{13 \times 1000} \over {87 \times 98}} = 1.52$
$\therefore$ Molality of 13% H2SO4 solution = 1.52 (m).
2nd Part : We know, Normality = Molarity $\times$ basicity of the acid. Here, basicity of H2SO4 = 2.
$\therefore$ N = 1.35 $\times$ 2 = 2.70 For dilution, N1V1 = N2V2
$\therefore$ 100 $\times$ 2.70 N = 1.5 N $\times$ V2 or, V2 = ${{100 \times 2.70} \over {1.5}}$ or, V2 = 180
$\therefore$ The sulphuric acid sample should be diluted upto 180 mL to prepare 1.5 N solution.
Explanation:
Let, percentage of isotope with atomic weight $10.01 = x$
and percentage of isotope with atomic weight $11.01 = 100 - x$
We know, average atomic weight formula,
${A_{avg}} = {{\sum {\left( {\% \,\mathrm{of}\,{I_i} \times \mathrm{Atomic\,Weight}} \right)} } \over {\sum {\left( {\% \,\mathrm{of}\,{I_i}} \right)} }}$
Here ${I_i}$ = i th isotope of an element.
Here given,
${A_{avg}} = 10.81$
$\therefore$ $10.81 = {{10.01 \times x + 11.01 \times (100 - x)} \over {x + 100 - x}}$
$ \Rightarrow 10.81 = {{10.01x + 11.01(100 - x)} \over {100}}$
$ \Rightarrow 1081 = 10.01x + 1101 - 11.01x$
$ \Rightarrow x = 1101 - 1081$
$ \Rightarrow x = 20$
$\therefore$ Isotope with weight 10.01 present = 20% and isotope with weight 11.01 present = 80%