Explanation:
Density $=10.5 \mathrm{~g} \mathrm{~cm}^{-3}$
Surface area $=10^{-12} \mathrm{~m}^2$
Volume of one silver atom $=4 / 3 \pi r^3$
$ \because \text { Density }=\frac{\text { Mass }}{\text { Volume }} \Rightarrow \text { Volume }=\frac{\text { Mass }}{\text { Density }} $
$\begin{aligned} & \text { or } \frac{4}{3} \pi r^3=\frac{108}{6.023 \times 10^{23} \times 10.5} \\\\ & r^3=\frac{108 \times 3}{6.023 \times 10^{23} \times 10.5 \times 4 \times 3.14} \\\\ & r^3=0.40 \times 10^{-23}=4 \times 10^{-24} \\\\ & \text { or } r=1.58 \times 10^{-8} \mathrm{~cm} \end{aligned}$
No. of silver atoms on a surface area of $10^{-12} \mathrm{~m}^2$ can be given by $10^{-12}=\mathrm{p} r^2 \times n$
$\begin{aligned} & n=\frac{10^{-12}}{3.14 \times\left(1.58 \times 10^{-10}\right)^2}=0.127 \times 10^8 \\\\ \Rightarrow & n=1.27 \times 10^7 \text { or } x=7\end{aligned}$
| Compound | Weight % of $\mathrm{P}$ | Weight % of $\mathrm{Q}$ |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 50 | 50 |
| 2 | 44.4 | 55.6 |
| 3 | 40 | 60 |
1 litre of mixture X + excess AgNO3 $ \to $ Y.
1 litre of mixture X + excess BaCl2 $ \to $ Z
No. of moles of Y and Z are
STATEMENT (S): In the titration of Na2CO3 with HCl using methyl orange indicator, the volume required at the equivalence point is twice that of the acid required using phenolphthalein indicator.
EXPLANATION (E): Two moles of HCl are required for the complete neutralization of one mole of Na2CO3
Explanation:
Given, 1 L of water = 1 kg = 1000 g (because density = 1000 kg m−3).
Therefore, the number of moles of solute present
= ${{1000} \over {18}}$ = 55.55 mol of H2O
So, the molarity is 55.55 mol/1 L = 55.55 M.
Explanation:
$ =\frac{20 \times M_1}{1000} $
$n$-factor of $\mathrm{KMnO}_4$ when it reacts with $\mathrm{MnSO}_4$ is 3.
$\therefore$ Equivalent of $\mathrm{KMnO}_4$ reacting with $\mathrm{MnSO}_4=\frac{20 \times M_1}{1000} \times 3$
$\therefore$ Equivalent of $\mathrm{MnSO}_4$ reacting with $\mathrm{KMnO}_4=\frac{20 \times M_1}{1000} \times 3$
Since $\mathrm{MnSO}_4$ has $n$-factor 2, the mole of $\mathrm{MnSO}_4$ reacting
$ =\frac{20 \times M_1}{1000} \times \frac{3}{2} $
Total mole of $\mathrm{MnO}_2$ produced $=$ mole of $\mathrm{KMnO}_4+$ mole of $ \mathrm{MnSO}_4 $
Equivalent of $\mathrm{Na}_2 \mathrm{C}_2 \mathrm{O}_4$ reacting with $\mathrm{MnO}_2=\frac{10 \times 0.2}{1000} \times 2$
$\therefore$ Equivalent of $\mathrm{MnO}_2=\frac{10 \times 0.2}{1000} \times 2$
Mole of $\mathrm{MnO}_2$ reacting with sodium oxalate $=\frac{10 \times 0.2 \times 2}{1000 \times 2}$
[as $n$-factor for $\mathrm{MnO}_2$ is 2].
Therefore, $\frac{20 \times M_1}{1000}+\left[\frac{20 \times M_1}{1000} \times \frac{3}{2}\right]=\frac{10 \times 0.2}{1000} ; M_1=0.04$
Equivalent of $\mathrm{KMnO}_4$ reacting with $\mathrm{H}_2 \mathrm{O}_2=\frac{20 \times 0.04}{1000} \times 5$ $ =0.004 $
If molarity of $\mathrm{H}_2 \mathrm{O}_2$ is $M_2$, then $=\frac{20 \times M_2 \times 2}{1000}=0.004$
$\therefore M_2=0.1 \mathrm{M}$
The reactions involved are:
$2 \mathrm{KMnO}_4+5 \mathrm{H}_2\mathrm{O}_2+3 \mathrm{H}_2\mathrm{SO}_4 \rightarrow \mathrm{K}_2\mathrm{SO}_4+2 \mathrm{MnSO}_4+8 \mathrm{H}_2\mathrm{O}+5 \mathrm{O}_2$,
$2 \mathrm{KMnO}_4+3 \mathrm{MnSO}_4+2 \mathrm{H}_2\mathrm{O} \rightarrow 5 \mathrm{MnO}_2+2 \mathrm{H}_2\mathrm{SO}_4+\mathrm{K}_2\mathrm{SO}_4$,
$\mathrm{MnO}_2+\mathrm{Na}_2\mathrm{C}_2\mathrm{O}_4+2 \mathrm{H}_2\mathrm{SO}_4 \rightarrow \mathrm{MnSO}_4+2 \mathrm{CO}_2+\mathrm{Na}_2\mathrm{SO}_4+2 \mathrm{H}_2\mathrm{O}$.
Explanation:
To determine how many millilitres of 0.5 M $ \text{H}_2\text{SO}_4 $ are needed to dissolve 0.5 g of copper(II) carbonate $ (\text{CuCO}_3) $, we first need to write the chemical reaction between the copper(II) carbonate and sulfuric acid ( $ \text{H}_2\text{SO}_4 $ ):
$ \text{CuCO}_3 + \text{H}_2\text{SO}_4 \rightarrow \text{CuSO}_4 + \text{H}_2\text{O} + \text{CO}_2 $
From this reaction, it's observable that 1 mole of copper(II) carbonate reacts with 1 mole of sulfuric acid to produce 1 mole of copper(II) sulfate, water, and carbon dioxide.
Let's calculate the number of moles of copper(II) carbonate in 0.5 g:
The molar mass of $ \text{CuCO}_3 $ is calculated as:
$ \text{Molar mass of } \text{CuCO}_3 = (\text{Molar mass of Cu}) + (\text{Molar mass of C}) + 3 \times (\text{Molar mass of O}) $
$ \text{Molar mass of } \text{CuCO}_3 = (63.55 \text{ g/mol}) + (12.01 \text{ g/mol}) + 3 \times (16.00\text{ g/mol}) $
$ \text{Molar mass of } \text{CuCO}_3 = 63.55 + 12.01 + 48.00 $
$ \text{Molar mass of } \text{CuCO}_3 = 123.56 \text{ g/mol} $
Now, we'll find out the number of moles in 0.5 g of $ \text{CuCO}_3 $:
$ \text{Number of moles of } \text{CuCO}_3 = \frac{\text{mass of } \text{CuCO}_3}{\text{Molar mass of } \text{CuCO}_3} $
$ \text{Number of moles of } \text{CuCO}_3 = \frac{0.5 \text{ g}}{123.56 \text{ g/mol}} $
$ \text{Number of moles of } \text{CuCO}_3 \approx 0.004046 \text{ mol} $
Since the reaction is a 1:1 molar ratio, the moles of sulfuric acid needed would also be $ 0.004046 \text{ mol} $.
The concentration (C) of a solution is given by the formula:
$ C = \frac{n}{V} $
where:
- $ C $ is the concentration of the solution in moles per liter (M).
- $ n $ is the number of moles of solute.
- $ V $ is the volume of solution in liters.
Rearranging the formula to solve for volume $ V $:
$ V = \frac{n}{C} $
The given concentration of $ \text{H}_2\text{SO}_4 $ is 0.5 M, which means 0.5 moles of $ \text{H}_2\text{SO}_4 $ per liter. Now, let's calculate the volume required for the $ 0.004046 \text{ mol} $ of $ \text{H}_2\text{SO}_4 $:
$ V = \frac{0.004046 \text{ mol}}{0.5 \text{ M}} = \frac{0.004046 \text{ mol}}{0.5 \text{ mol/L}} $
$ V = 0.008092 \text{ L} $
To convert liters to millilitres:
$ V(\text{mL}) = 0.008092 \text{ L} \times 1000 \frac{\text{mL}}{\text{L}} $
$ V(\text{mL}) = 8.092 \text{ mL} $
Therefore, you will need approximately 8.092 mL of 0.5 M $ \text{H}_2\text{SO}_4 $ to completely dissolve 0.5 g of copper(II) carbonate under the assumption that the reaction goes to completion with no side reactions.
Explanation:
Volume of a cylinder = $\pi$r2h
Radius of virus $ = {{150} \over 2} = 75\mathop A\limits^o = 75 \times {10^{ - 8}}$ cm.
$\therefore$ Volume of one virus
$ = {{22} \over 7} \times {(75 \times {10^{ - 8}})^2} \times 5000 \times {10^{ - 8}}$ cm3
$ = 8.8397 \times {10^{ - 17}}$ cm3
Mass of one virus
$ = {{Volume} \over {Specific\,volume}} = {{8.8393 \times {{10}^{ - 17}}\,c{m^3}} \over {0.75\,c{m^3}\,{g^ - }}}$
$ = 1.178 \times {10^{ - 16}}\,g$
Mol. wt. of virus
$ = 1.178 \times {10^{ - 16}} \times 6.02 \times {10^{23}}\,g$ mol$-$1
$ = 7.09 \times {10^7}\,g$ mol$-$1
Explanation:
To calculate the molarity of the sodium thiosulphate solution, we'll need to apply stoichiometry principles. First, we must determine the number of moles of $ \text{KIO}_3 $ as it will relate to the number of moles of $ \text{I}_2 $ liberated during the reaction. Then we will use the volume of the sodium thiosulphate solution to find its molarity.
The reaction for the iodometry where $ \text{I}_2 $ is liberated from $ \text{KIO}_3 $ and reacted with the excess of $ \text{KI} $ is:
$ \text{KIO}_3 + 5 \text{KI} + 6 \text{HCl} \rightarrow 3 \text{I}_2 + 6 \text{KCl} + 3 \text{H}_2\text{O} $
From the balanced equation, we see that 1 mole of $ \text{KIO}_3 $ produces 3 moles of $ \text{I}_2 $.
Now let's find the number of moles of $ \text{KIO}_3 $:
$ \text{Moles of } \text{KIO}_3 = \frac{\text{mass of } \text{KIO}_3}{\text{molar mass of } \text{KIO}_3} $
$ = \frac{0.10 \text{ g}}{214.0 \text{ g/mol}} $
To get the number of moles, we need to perform the division:
$ = \frac{0.10}{214.0} $
$ = 4.6728972 \times 10^{-4} \text{ moles of } \text{KIO}_3 $
Since 1 mole of $ \text{KIO}_3 $ yields 3 moles of $ \text{I}_2 $, we multiply the moles of $ \text{KIO}_3 $ by 3:
$ \text{Moles of } \text{I}_2 = 3 \times 4.6728972 \times 10^{-4} $
$ = 1.4018692 \times 10^{-3} \text{ moles of } \text{I}_2 $
Next, $ \text{I}_2 $ reacts with sodium thiosulphate ($ \text{Na}_2\text{S}_2\text{O}_3 $) in the following stoichiometric reaction:
$ \text{I}_2 + 2 \text{Na}_2\text{S}_2\text{O}_3 \rightarrow 2 \text{NaI} + \text{Na}_2\text{S}_4\text{O}_6 $
From the reaction, 1 mole of $ \text{I}_2 $ reacts with 2 moles of sodium thiosulphate. Therefore, the moles of sodium thiosulphate required to react with the $ \text{I}_2 $ produced can be calculated as follows:
$ \text{Moles of } \text{Na}_2\text{S}_2\text{O}_3 = 2 \times \text{Moles of } \text{I}_2 $
$ = 2 \times 1.4018692 \times 10^{-3} $
$ = 2.8037384 \times 10^{-3} \text{ moles of } \text{Na}_2\text{S}_2\text{O}_3 $
Now we have to calculate the molarity of the sodium thiosulphate solution. Molarity (M) is defined as the number of moles of solute divided by the volume of solution in liters:
$ M = \frac{\text{moles of solute}}{\text{volume of solution in liters}} $
We have the number of moles of sodium thiosulphate and the volume is given as 45.0 mL which needs to be converted to liters:
$ \text{Volume in liters} = 45.0 \text{ mL} \times \frac{1 \text{ L}}{1000 \text{ mL}} = 0.045 \text{ L} $
Substitute the number of moles and the volume into the molarity formula:
$ M = \frac{2.8037384 \times 10^{-3} \text{ moles}}{0.045 \text{ L}} $
Performing the division gives us the molarity:
$ M = \frac{2.8037384 \times 10^{-3}}{0.045} $
$ = 0.0623053 \text{ M} $
So, the molarity of the sodium thiosulphate solution is approximately $ 0.0623 $ M.
Explanation:
$ \begin{aligned} & \mathrm{Fe}_3 \mathrm{O}_4+\mathrm{I}^{-} \longrightarrow 3 \mathrm{Fe}^{2+}+\mathrm{I}_2\left(n \text {-factor of } \mathrm{Fe}_3 \mathrm{O}_4=2\right) \\\\ & \mathrm{Fe}_2 \mathrm{O}_3+\mathrm{I}^{-} \longrightarrow 2 \mathrm{Fe}^{2+}+\mathrm{I}_2\left(n \text {-factor of } \mathrm{Fe}_2 \mathrm{O}_3=2\right) \end{aligned} $
$\begin{aligned} \Rightarrow \text { Meq of } \mathrm{I}_2 \text { formed } & =\mathrm{Meq}\left(\mathrm{Fe}_3 \mathrm{O}_4+\mathrm{Fe}_2 \mathrm{O}_3\right) =\text { Meq of hypo required } \\\\ \Rightarrow 2 x+2 y & =11 \times 0.5 \times 5=27.5 ...........(i)\end{aligned}$
Now, total millimol of $\mathrm{Fe}^{2+}$ formed $=3 x+2 y$. In the reaction
$ \begin{array}{ll} \mathrm{Fe}^{2+}+\mathrm{MnO}_4^{-}+\mathrm{H}^{+} \longrightarrow \mathrm{Fe}^{3+}+\mathrm{Mn}^{2+} \\\\ n \text {-factor of } \mathrm{Fe}^{2+}=1 \\\\ \Rightarrow \text { Meq of } \mathrm{MnO}_4^{-}=\text {Meq of } \mathrm{Fe}^{2+} \\\\ \Rightarrow 3 x+2 y=12.8 \times 0.25 \times 5 \times 2=32 ...........(ii) \end{array} $
Solving Eqs. (i) and (ii), we get
$ \begin{aligned} x=4.5 \text { and } y=9.25 \end{aligned} $
$\begin{aligned} \Rightarrow \text { Mass of } \mathrm{Fe}_3 \mathrm{O}_4 & =\frac{4.5}{1000} \times 232=1.044 \mathrm{~g} \\\\ \% \text { mass of } \mathrm{Fe}_3 \mathrm{O}_4 & =\frac{1.044}{3} \times 100=34.80 \% \\\\ \text { Mass of } \mathrm{Fe}_2 \mathrm{O}_3 & =\frac{9.25}{1000} \times 160=1.48 \mathrm{~g} \\\\ \% \text { mass of } \mathrm{Fe}_2 \mathrm{O}_3 & =\frac{1.48}{3} \times 100=49.33 \%\end{aligned}$
Explanation:
Glauber's salt is $\mathrm{Na}_2 \mathrm{SO}_4 \cdot 10 \mathrm{H}_2 \mathrm{O}$.
Molecular weight of $\mathrm{Na}_2 \mathrm{SO}_4=142$
Molecular weight of $\mathrm{Na}_2 \mathrm{SO}_4 \cdot 10 \mathrm{H}_2 \mathrm{O}=322$
Weight of Glauber's salt taken $=8.0575 \times 10^{-2} \mathrm{~kg}=80.575 \mathrm{~g}$
Weight of anhydrous $\mathrm{Na}_2 \mathrm{SO}_4$ in $322 \mathrm{~g}$ of Glauber's salt
$=142 / 322 \mathrm{~g}$
$\therefore$ Weight of anhydrous $\mathrm{Na}_2 \mathrm{SO}_4$ in $80.575 \mathrm{~g}$ of Glauber's salt
$ =\frac{142}{322} \times 80.575=35.53 \mathrm{~g} $
Hence number of moles of $\mathrm{Na}_2 \mathrm{SO}_4$ per $\mathrm{dm}^3$ of solution
$ =\frac{35.53}{142}=0.25 $
So, the molarity of solution is $0.25 \mathrm{M}$
$ \begin{aligned} \text { Density of solution } & =1077.2 \mathrm{~kg} \mathrm{~m}^{-3} \\\\ & =\frac{1077.2 \times 10^3}{10^6} \mathrm{~g} \mathrm{~cm}^{-3}=1.0772 \mathrm{~g} \mathrm{~cm}^{-3} \end{aligned} $
$\begin{aligned} & \text { Weight of solution }=\text { volume } \times \text { density } \\\\ & =1000 \times 1.0772 \mathrm{~g}=1077.2 \mathrm{~g} \\\\ & \text { Weight of water }=(1077.2-35.53)=1041.67 \mathrm{~g} \\\\ & \text { Molality of solution }=\frac{0.25}{1041.67} \times 1000=0.24 \mathrm{~m}\end{aligned}$
$\begin{aligned} & \text { Number of moles of water in solution }=\frac{1041.67}{18}=57.87 \\\\ & \text { Mole fraction of } \mathrm{Na}_2 \mathrm{SO}_4=\frac{\text { Moles of } \mathrm{Na}_2 \mathrm{SO}_4}{\text { Total number of moles }} \\\\ & \qquad=\frac{0.25}{0.25+57.87}=0.0043 \text { or } 4.3 \times 10^{-3}\end{aligned}$
Explanation:
To determine the percentage of iron present as Fe(III) in the sample of wustite (Fe0.93O1.00), we need to assume that the rest of the iron that is not Fe(II) is present as Fe(III). This is because wustite, which nominally has the formula FeO, has a non-stoichiometric composition due to the presence of both Fe(II) and Fe(III) ions that maintain charge neutrality in the lattice.
Given the formula Fe0.93O1.00, for every one oxygen atom, there are 0.93 irons. In terms of charge, the oxygen anion has a charge of -2. The formula can be interpreted as having 0.93 moles of Fe per mole of wustite, and we need to balance the charges considering the presence of both Fe(II) and Fe(III).
Fe(II) has a charge of +2, and Fe(III) has a charge of +3. If we let x be the fraction of Fe(III), then the fraction of Fe(II) would be 0.93 - x because the total amount of iron is 0.93 moles of iron (Fe). Now, we can set up a charge balance equation:
Charge from Fe(II) + Charge from Fe(III) = Charge from O
(0.93 - x)(+2) + (x)(+3) = 1(+2)
2(0.93 - x) + 3x = 2
1.86 - 2x + 3x = 2
Combining like terms gives:
1.86 + x = 2
x = 2 - 1.86
x = 0.14
So, 0.14 moles of Fe are in the form of Fe(III) per mole of wustite.
To find the percentage of Fe(III), you divide the number of moles of Fe(III) by the total moles of Fe and multiply by 100%:
$ \text{Percentage of Fe(III)} = \left( \frac{x}{0.93} \right) \times 100\% $
$ \text{Percentage of Fe(III)} = \left( \frac{0.14}{0.93} \right) \times 100\% $
$ \text{Percentage of Fe(III)} = (0.1505) \times 100\% $
$ \text{Percentage of Fe(III)} = 15.05\% $
Therefore, 15.05% of the iron is present in the form of Fe(III) in the sample of wustite Fe0.93O1.00.
Explanation:
The reaction is $\to$

$C{r_2}{(S{O_4})_3}$ is limiting reagent as ${{2.5} \over 1} < {{11.25} \over 3}$.
$\therefore$ $2.5 - x = 0$
$ \Rightarrow x = 2.5$ milimoles
$\therefore$ Moles of $PbS{O_4}$ formed $ = 3x = 3 \times 2.5 = 7.5 \times {10^{ - 3}}$ moles
After $PbS{O_4}$ precipitate formation in the solution $Pb{(N{O_3})_2}$ and $Cr{(N{O_3})_2}$ remains.
$\therefore$ Milimoles of remaining $Pb{(N{O_3})_2}$ is $ = 11.25 - 3x = 11.25 - 3 \times 2.5 = 3.75$
And milimoles of remaining $Cr{(N{O_3})_2}$ is $ = 2x = 2 \times 2.5 = 5$
$\therefore$ Molar concentration or molarity of $Pb{(N{O_3})_2} = {{3.75 \times {{10}^{ - 3}}} \over {{{45 + 25} \over {1000}}}} = 0.054\,M$
And molarity of $Cr{(N{O_3})_2} = {{5 \times {{10}^{ - 3}}} \over {{{70} \over {1000}}}} = 0.071\,M$
Explanation:
$ 2 \mathrm{NaHCO}_3 \longrightarrow \mathrm{Na}_2 \mathrm{CO}_3+\mathrm{H}_2 \mathrm{O}+\mathrm{CO}_2 $
$ \begin{aligned} \text { Moles of } \mathrm{CO}_2 \text { produced } & =\frac{p V}{R T}=\frac{750}{760} \times \frac{123.9}{1000} \times \frac{1}{0.082 \times 298} \\\\ & =5 \times 10^{-3} \end{aligned} $
$\begin{aligned} & \Rightarrow \text { Moles of } \mathrm{NaHCO}_3 \text { in } 2 \mathrm{~g} \text { sample }=2 \times 5 \times 10^{-3}=0.01 \\\\ & \Rightarrow \text { millimol of } \mathrm{NaHCO}_3 \text { in } 1.5 \mathrm{~g} \text { sample } \\\\ & \qquad=\frac{0.01}{2} \times 1.5 \times 1000=7.5\end{aligned}$
Let the $1.5 \mathrm{~g}$ sample contain $x$ millimol $\mathrm{Na}_2 \mathrm{CO}_3$, then
$ \begin{array}{rlrl} & 2 x+7.5 =\text { millimol of } \mathrm{HCl}=15 \\\\ & \Rightarrow x =3.75 \end{array} $
$\begin{aligned} \Rightarrow \text { Mass of } \mathrm{NaHCO}_3 =\frac{7.5 \times 84}{1000}=0.63 \mathrm{~g} \\\\ \text { Mass of } \mathrm{Na}_2 \mathrm{CO}_3=\frac{3.75 \times 106}{1000}=0.3975 \mathrm{~g}\end{aligned}$
$\begin{aligned} \Rightarrow \% \text { mass of } \mathrm{NaHCO}_3 =\frac{0.63}{1.50} \times 100=42 \% \\\\ \% \text { mass of } \mathrm{Na}_2 \mathrm{CO}_3 =\frac{0.3975}{1.5} \times 100=26.5 \%\end{aligned}$
$\begin{aligned} \% \text { of } \mathrm{Na}_2 \mathrm{SO}_4 \text { in the sample } & =100-(42+26.5) \\\\ & =100-68.5=31.5 \%\end{aligned}$
(Reaction : KIO3 + 2KI + 6HCl $\to$ 3ICl + 3KCl + 3H2O)
Explanation:
First, let's write down the given data for clarity:
- Mass of commercial AgNO3 = 1 g
- Volume of the KI solution used = 50 ml
- Volume of (M/10) KIO3 solution used to titrate excess KI = 50 ml
- Volume of (M/10) KIO3 solution used to titrate 20 ml of KI solution = 30 ml
From the reaction given:
$ KIO_3 + 2KI + 6HCl \to 3ICl + 3KCl + 3H_2O $
It can be seen that 1 mole of KIO3 reacts with 2 moles of KI. The molarity of KIO3 solution is also given as (M/10), which means 0.1 M.
First, let's calculate the moles of KIO3 used to titrate the excess KI present after the precipitation of AgI:
$ \text{Moles of KIO}_3 = \text{Volume} \times \text{Molarity} $
$ = 50 \text{ ml} \times 0.1 \text{ M} $
Since 1 liter is 1000 ml, we convert ml to liters:
$ = \frac{50}{1000} \text{ L} \times \text{0.1 M} $
$ = 0.005 \text{ moles} $
Now, 1 mole of KIO3 reacts with 2 moles of KI; therefore, 0.005 moles of KIO3 will react with:
$ 0.005 \text{ moles KIO}_3 \times 2 \text{ moles KI} / 1 \text{ mole KIO}_3 $
$ = 0.01 \text{ moles KI} $
So, the excess amount of KI after the precipitation of AgI is 0.01 moles.
Next, we need to find out the amount of KI present in the 20 ml of KI solution that reacts with 30 ml of the KIO3 solution.
$ \text{Moles of KIO}_3 (for 20 \text{ ml KI solution}) = \text{Volume} \times \text{Molarity} $
$ = 30 \text{ ml} \times 0.1 \text{ M} $
$ = \frac{30}{1000} \text{ L} \times \text{0.1 M} $
$ = 0.003 \text{ moles KIO}_3 $
This will react with twice the amount of KI:
$ 0.003 \text{ moles KIO}_3 \times 2 \text{ moles KI} / 1 \text{ mole KIO}_3 $
$ = 0.006 \text{ moles KI} $
This amount is present in 20 ml of the KI solution. To find the amount of KI in the initial 50 ml used for the reaction with AgNO3, we set up a proportion, assuming the KI solution is uniform in concentration:
$ \frac{0.006 \text{ moles KI}}{20 \text{ ml}} = \frac{x \text{ moles KI}}{50 \text{ ml}} $
Solving for x:
$ x = \frac{0.006 \text{ moles KI} \times 50 \text{ ml}}{20 \text{ ml}} $
$ x = 0.015 \text{ moles KI} $
From the reaction between AgNO3 and KI:
$ AgNO_3 + KI \to AgI \downarrow + KNO_3 $
You can see that 1 mole of AgNO3 reacts with 1 mole of KI. If 0.01 moles of KI remained after the reaction, the amount of KI that reacted with AgNO3 is:
$ 0.015 \text{ moles KI (total)} - 0.01 \text{ moles KI (excess)} $
$ = 0.005 \text{ moles KI reacted with AgNO}_3 $
Therefore, the moles of AgNO3 in the 1 gram commercial sample is also 0.005 moles, since the molar ratio of AgNO3 to KI is 1:1. Now, let's calculate the mass of 0.005 moles of pure AgNO3:
The molar mass of AgNO3 = Atomic mass of Ag + Atomic mass of N + 3 x Atomic mass of O
= 108 + 14 + 3 x 16 = 170 g/mol
The mass of 0.005 moles of AgNO3 is:
$ 0.005 \text{ moles} \times 170 \text{ g/mol} $
$ = 0.85 \text{ grams} $
Finally, to find the percentage of AgNO3 in the sample, we divide the mass of pure AgNO3 by the mass of the commercial sample and multiply by 100%.
$ \text{Percentage of AgNO}_3 = \frac{0.8493655 \text{ g}}{1 \text{ g}} \times 100\% $
$ = 85\% $
Thus, the sample contains approximately 85 AgNO3.
Find out the molar ratio of Cu2+ to $C_2O_4^{2-}$ in the compound.Write down the balanced redox reactions involved in the above titrations.
Explanation:
93% ${H_2}S{O_4}$ solution weight by volume means in 100 ml solution 93 gm ${H_2}S{O_4}$ present.
Density of solution = 1.84 g/mL
$\therefore$ Weight of solution = 100 $\times$ 1.84 = 184 gm
$\therefore$ Weight of solvent ${H_2}O$ = 184 $-$ 93 = 91 gm
Now,
$\mathrm{Molality ={{Moles\,of\,solute} \over {Weight\,of\,solvent\,in\,Kg}}}$
$ = {{{{93} \over {98}}} \over {{{91} \over {1000}}}} = 10.42$
Explanation:
Note : 
Let, weight of $Pb{(N{O_3})_2}$ in the mixture = x gm
Then weight of $NaN{O_3}$ in the mixture $ = (5 - x)$ gm
$\therefore$ Moles of $Pb{(N{O_3})_2} = {x \over {332}}$
and moles of $NaN{O_3} = {{5 - x} \over {85}}$
$\therefore$ Moles of $PbO = {x \over {332}}$
and moles of $NaN{O_2} = {{5 - x} \over {85}}$
Loss in weight happens as gaseous substance removed from the mixture.
$\therefore$ Weight of residue $PbO$ and $NaN{O_2} = 100 - 28 = 72\% $
$\therefore$ Weight of residue $ = 5 \times {{72} \over {100}} = 3.6$ gm
$\therefore$ Weight of $PbO$ + Weight of $NaN{O_2} = 3.6$
$ \Rightarrow {x \over {332}} \times 224 + {{5 - x} \over {85}} \times 69 = 3.6$
$ \Rightarrow 224x + (5 - x) \times 69 \times 332 = 3.6 \times 85 \times 332$
$ \Rightarrow x = 3.324$ g
$\therefore$ Weight of $Pb{(N{O_3})_2} = 3.324$ gm
$\therefore$ Weight of $NaN{O_3} = 5 - 3.324 = 1.676$ gm
Explanation:
Weight of sugar syrup = 214.2 gm
Weight of solute sugar = 34.2 gm
$\therefore$ Weight of solvent (H2O) = 214.2 $-$ 34.2 = 180 gm
(i) Molal concentration or molality
$ = {{Number\,of\,moles\,of\,solute} \over {Weight\,of\,solvent\,in\,kg}}$
$ = {{{{34.2} \over {342}}} \over {{{180} \over {1000}}}}$
$ = {{100} \over {180}} = 0.56$
(ii) Mole fraction of sugar
$ = {{{{34.2} \over {342}}} \over {{{34.2} \over {342}} + {{180} \over {18}}}}$
$ = {{0.1} \over {0.1 + 10}}$
$ = {{0.1} \over {10.1}} = 0.0099$
Reaction:
4Fe3+ + N2H4 $\to$ N2 + 4Fe2+ + 4H+
$MnO_4^-$ + 4Fe2+ + 8H+ $\to$ Mn2+ + 5Fe3+ + 4H2O
Explanation:
On heating, we have XCO3 $\to$ XO + CO2
The loss of mass (= 4.08 g $-$ 3.64 g = 0.44 g) is due to the removal of CO2. Thus
Amount of CO2 released = ${{0.44g} \over {44\,g\,mo{l^{ - 1}}}}$ = 10$-$2 mol
Hence, Amount of XO = 10$-$2 mol
Now, mass of BaO in the mixture after heating = 3.64 g $-$ (10$-$2 mol) (MXO)
= 3.64 g $-$ (10$-$2 mol) (MX + 16 g mol$-$1)
= 3.48 g $-$ (10$-$2 mol) (MX)
From the dissolution reactions
BaO + 2HCl $\to$ BaCl2 + H2O
XO + 2HCl $\to$ XCl2 + H2O
We conclude that
Amount of HCl consumed for the dissolution process = $2\left[ {{{3.48g - ({{10}^{ - 2}}mol){M_X}} \over {{M_{BaO}}}} + {{10}^{ - 2}}mol} \right]$
Amount of HCl taken for the dissolution process = (100 mL) (0.1 M) = $\left( {{{100} \over {1000}}L} \right)$ (1 mol L$-$1) = 0.1 mol
Amount of remaining HCl = 0.1 mol $-$ $2\left[ {{{3.48g - ({{10}^{ - 2}}mol){M_X}} \over {154g\,mo{l^{ - 1}}}} + {{10}^{ - 2}}mol} \right]$
Since the remaining HCl required 16 mL of 2.5 M NaOH $\left( { = {{16} \over {1000}} \times 2.5\,mol} \right)$ for complete neutralization, we would have
${{{16 \times 2.5} \over {1000}}}$ mol = 0.1 mol $-$ 2 $\left[ {{{3.48g - ({{10}^{ - 2}}mol){M_X}} \over {154g\,mo{l^{ - 1}}}} + {{10}^{ - 2}}mol} \right]$
This gives ${M_X} = {{\left( {{{16 \times 2.5} \over {1000}} - 0.1 + 2 \times {{10}^{ - 2}}} \right)\left( {{{154} \over 2}} \right)g + 3.48g} \over {({{10}^{ - 2}}\,mol)}}$ = 40 g mol$-$1
Hence, the element X is Ca.
(i) the percentage by weight of sodium thiosulphate,
(ii) the mole fraction of sodium thiosulphate and
(iii) the molalities of Na+ and $S_2O_3^{-2}$ ions
Explanation:
3 M Na2S2O3 solution means 3 moles of Na2S2O3 present in 1 litre of solution.
$\therefore$ Volume of solution = 1 litre = 1000 ml
Density of solution = 1.25 g/ml
$\therefore$ Mass of solution = 1000 $\times$ 1.25 = 1250 gm
Molar mass of Na2S2O3 = 158 gm
$\therefore$ Weight of solute Na2S2O3 = 3 $\times$ 158 = 474 gm
$\therefore$ Weight of water = 1250 $-$ 474 = 776 gm
(i) % weight of $N{a_2}{S_2}{O_3} = {{Weight\,of\,N{a_2}{S_2}{O_3}} \over {Weight\,of\,solution}} \times 100$
$ = {{474} \over {1250}} \times 100$
$ = 37.92$
(ii) Mole fraction of $N{a_2}{S_2}{O_3} = {{Moles\,of\,N{a_2}{S_2}{O_3}} \over {Moles\,of\,N{a_2}{S_2}{O_3} + Moles\,of\,{H_2}O}}$
$ = {3 \over {3 + {{776} \over {18}}}}$
$ = 0.065$
(iii) Molality of solution (m) $ = {{Moles\,of\,solute} \over {Weight\,of\,solvent\,in\,kg}}$
$\therefore$ $m = {3 \over {{{776} \over {1000}}}}$
$ = 3.865$
$N{a_2}{S_2}{O_3}\buildrel {} \over \longrightarrow 2N{a^ + } + {S_2}O_3^{ - 2}$
$\therefore$ Molality of $N{a^ + } = 2 \times 3.865 = 7.732$
and Molality of ${S_2}O_3^{ - 2} = 3.865$
2NH2OH + 4Fe3+ $\to$ N2O(g) $ \uparrow $ + H2O + 4Fe2+ + 4H+
Iron (II) thus produced is estimated by titration with a standard permanganate solution. The reaction is :
$MnO_4^-$ + 5Fe2+ + 8H+ $\to$ Mn2+ + 5Fe3+ + 4H2O
A 10 ml sample of hydroxylamine solution was Diluted to 1 litre. 50 ml of this diluted solution was boiled with an excess of iron (III) solution. The resulting solution required 12 ml of 0.02 M KMnO4 solution for complete oxidation of iron (II). Calculate the weight of hydroxylamine in one litre of the original solution. (H = 1, N = 14, O = 16, K =39, Mn = 55, Fe = 56)
Explanation:
From the given chemical equations, we find that
2 mol of NH2OH $\equiv$ 4 mol Fe2+ and 1 mol MnO$_4^ - $ $\equiv$ 5 mol Fe2+
Amount of MnO$_4^ - $ consumed in the oxidation of iron (H)
V M = (12 mL) (0.02 M) = $\left( {{{12} \over {1000}}L} \right)$ (0.02 mol L$-$1) = ${{12 \times 0.02} \over {1000}}$ mol
Since 1 mol MnO$_4^ - $ $\equiv$ 5 mol Fe2+, we have
Amount of Fe2+ formed by the reduction of Fe3+ by NH2OH = (5) $\left( {{{12 \times 0.02} \over {1000}}} \right)$ mol
Now since 2 mol NH2OH $\equiv$ 4 mol Fe2+, we have
Amount of NH2OH present in 50 mL of diluted solution = $\left( {{2 \over 4}} \right)(5)\left( {{{12 \times 0.02} \over {1000}}} \right)$ mol
Amount of NH2OH present in 1 L of diluted solution = $\left( {{{1000} \over {50}}} \right)\left( {{2 \over 4}} \right)(5)\left( {{{12 \times 0.02} \over {1000}}} \right)$ mol
Amount of NH2OH present in 1 L of undiluted solution = $\left( {{{1000} \over {10}}} \right)\left( {{{1000} \over {50}}} \right)\left( {{2 \over 4}} \right)(5)\left( {{{12 \times 0.02} \over {1000}}} \right)$ mol = 1.2 mol
Mass of NH2OH present in 1 L of undiluted solution = (1.2 mol) (33 g mol$-$1) = 39.6 g.
Explanation:
The equations involved are
$MnO_4^ - + 8{H^ + } + 5{e^ - } \to M{n^{2 + }} + 4{H_2}O] \times 2$
${H_2}{O_2} \to {O_2} + 2{H^ + } + 2{e^ - }] \times 5$
$2MnO_4^ - + 5{H_2}{O_2} + 6{H^ + } \to 2M{n^{2 + }} + 5{O_2} + 8{H_2}O$
From this equation, we find that
Equivalent mass of ${H_2}{O_2},\,{M_{eq}} = {{Molar\,mass\,of\,{H_2}{O_2}} \over {2\,eq\,mo{l^{ - 1}}}} = {{34g\,mo{l^{ - 1}}} \over {2\,eq\,mo{l^{ - 1}}}} = 17\,g\,e{q^{ - 1}}$
Mass of H2O2 in the given 1.0 g sample, ${m_{eq}} = {X \over {100}} \times 1.0\,g$
Amount (in equivalents) of H2O2 in the given 1.0 g sample is
${n_{eq}} = {m \over {{M_{eq}}}} = {{(X/100)g} \over {17\,g\,e{q^{ - 1}}}} = {X \over {17 \times 100}}eq$
If NKMnO4 is the normality of KMnO4, the amount (in equivalents) of KMnO4 consumed is
$n{'_{eq}} = {V_{KMn{O_4}}}\,{N_{KMn{O_4}}} = \left( {{X \over {1000}}L} \right){N_{KMn{O_4}}}$
Equating Eqs (1) and (2), we get
$\left( {{X \over {1000}}L} \right){N_{KMn{O_4}}} = {X \over {17 \times 100}}eq$
or, ${N_{KMn{O_4}}} = {{10} \over {17}}eq\,{L^{ - 1}} = 0.588\,eq\,{L^{ - 1}}$
(i) The total number of neutrons and
(ii) The total mass of neutron in 7 mg of 14C
(Assume that mass of neutron = mass of hydrogen atom)
(a) 1 litre of a mixture of CO and CO2 is taken. This mixture is passed through a tube containing red hot charcoal. The volume now becomes 1.6 litre. The volumes are measured under the same conditions. Find the composition of the mixture by volume.
(b) A compound contains 28 percent of nitrogen and 72 percent of metal by weight. 3 atoms of metal combine with 2 atoms of N. Find the atomic weight of metal.
Explanation:
(a) Volume of mixture of CO and CO2 = 1 L
Let volume of $C{O_2} = V\,L$
$\therefore$ Volume of $CO = (1 - V)\,L$
Now mixture is passed through red hot charcoal.
$\therefore$ Reaction is :

Volume only count for gases for the reaction involving gases. That is why volume of solid C is not counted.
After reaction completed volume becomes = 1.6 L
$\therefore$ $1 + V = 1.6$
$ \Rightarrow V = 0.6$
$\therefore$ Volume of CO2 in the mixture = 0.6 L and volume of CO = $ = 1 - 0.6 = 0.4\,L$.
$\therefore$ 60% CO2 and 40% CO.
(b) We know,
% of any element $ = {{Weight\,of\,element} \over {Molar\,mass\,of\,compound}} \times 100$
Let, atomic mass of metal M = A
Given compound contains 28% nitrogen.
And 3 atom of metal combine with 2 atoms of nitrogen.
$\therefore$ $28 = {{14 \times 2} \over {3A + 14 \times 2}} \times 100$
$ \Rightarrow 3A + 28 = 100$
$ \Rightarrow 3A = 72$
$ \Rightarrow A = 24$
$\therefore$ Atomic weight of metal = 24
$\therefore$ Metal is = Mg
$3Mg + {N_2} \to M{g_3}{N_2}$
(b) A sample of hard water contains 20 mg of Ca++ ions per litre. How many milli-equivalent of Na2CO3 would be required to soften 1 litre of the sample?
(c) 1 gm of Mg is burnt in a closed vessel which contains 0.5gm of O2.
(i) Which reactant is left in excess?
(ii) Find the weight of the excess reactants.
(iii) How many milliliters of 0.5N H2SO4 will dissolve the residue in the vessel?
Explanation:

111 mg CaCl2 will give CaCO3 = 100 mg
1 mg CaCl2 will give CaCO3 = ${{100} \over {111}}$ mg
Similarly,
1 mg MgCl2 will give $CaC{O_3} = {{100} \over {95}}$ mg
Total CaCO3 formed due to 1 mg CaCl2 and 1 mg of MgCl2
$ = {{100} \over {111}} + {{100} \over {95}}$ mg = 2 mg
CaCO3 per litre of water = 2 mg
Weight of 1 ml of water = 1 g = 103 mg
Weight of 1000 ml of water = 103 $\times$ 103 mg = 106 mg
2 mg of CaCO3 is present in 106 mg of water.
or 2 parts of CaCO3 in 106 part of water.
(b) $C{a^{2 + }} + N{a_2}C{O_3} \to CaC{O_3} + 2N{a^ + }$
Equivalent weight of $C{a^{2 + }} = {{40} \over 2} = 20$
1 milliequivalent of Ca2+ = 20 mg
1 milliequi. of Ca2+ = 1 millieq. of Na2CO3
$\therefore$ 1 milliequivalent of Na2CO3 is required to soften 1 litre of hard water.
(c) Magnesium burns in O2 to form MgO. The reaction involved is:
$\mathop {2\,mg}\limits_{2 \times 24 = 48\,g} + \mathop {{O_2}}\limits_{32\,g} \to \mathop {2MgO}\limits_{2[24 + 16] = 80\,g} $
(i) According to the above equation, 48 g Mg requires O2 = 32g
1 g Mg requires O2 = ${{32} \over {48}}$ g = 0.66 g
Since the oxygen available is only 0.50 g, so whole of magnesium will not burn. Thus magnesium is in excess.
(ii) Again from the balanced equation, 32 g O2 reacts with magnesium = 48 g
0.5 g O2 reacts with magnesium
$ = {{48} \over {32}} \times 0.5 = 0.75$ g
Hence, weight of magnesium in excess
= (1.0 $-$ 0.75) = 0.25 g
(iii) Unused magnesium dissolves in H2SO4 according to the following equation:
$\mathop {Mg}\limits_{24\,g} + \mathop {{H_2}S{O_4}}\limits_{98\,g} \to MgS{O_4} + {H_2}$
$\therefore$ H2SO4 required to dissolve 0.25 g Mg
$ = {{98} \over {24}} \times 0.25 = 1.021\,g$
MgO formed dissolves in H2SO4 according to the following equation:
$\mathop {MgO}\limits_{24 + 16 = 40\,g} + \mathop {{H_2}S{O_4}}\limits_{98\,g} \to MgS{O_4} + {H_2}O$
MgO formed from 0.75
$Mg = {{80} \over {48}} \times 0.75 = 1.25\,g$
H2SO4 required to dissolve 1.25 g MgO
$ = {{98} \over {40}} \times 1.25 = 3.062\,g$
Total weight of H2SO4 required to dissolve the residue = 1.021 + 3.062 = 4.083 g
Strength of given
H2SO4 = Normality $\times$ Eq. wt.
= 0.5 $\times$ 49 = 24.5 g L$-$1
Hence, 24.5 g H2SO4 is present in 1000 mL 4.083 g H2SO4 is present in
$ = {{1000} \over {24.5}} \times 4.083$ mL = 166.65 mL
(ii). The residue is dissolved in 100 ml of 0.1N FeSO4 containing dilute H2SO4.
(iii). The solution reacts completely with 50 ml of KMnO4 solution.
(iv). 25 ml of the KMnO4 solution used in step (iii) requires 30 ml of 0.1 N FeSO4 solution for complete reaction.
Find the amount of MnSO4.4H2O present in the sample.
Explanation:
To find the amount of $ \text{MnSO}_4\cdot4\text{H}_2\text{O} $ present in the sample, we can follow the steps below, applying stoichiometry and the principle of equivalence in titration. Let's analyze each step to solve this problem:
Step (i): Heating MnSO4.4H2OWhen $ \text{MnSO}_4\cdot4\text{H}_2\text{O} $ is strongly heated, it decomposes, and the end product mentioned is $ \text{Mn}_3\text{O}_4 $. The chemical equation for the decomposition isn't provided directly, but it's crucial to know that we end up with $ \text{Mn}_3\text{O}_4 $ which indicates the reduction of the sulfate.
Step (ii): Dissolving the residue in FeSO4 solutionThe $ \text{Mn}_3\text{O}_4 $ residue reacts with $ \text{FeSO}_4 $ in the presence of dilute $ \text{H}_2\text{SO}_4 $. Here, $ \text{Fe}^{2+} $ acts as a reducing agent.
Step (iii): Reaction with KMnO4The solution from step (ii) completely reacts with $ \text{KMnO}_4 $, using 50 ml of $ \text{KMnO}_4 $ solution.
Step (iv): KMnO4 solution titrationHere, we learn that 25 ml of the $ \text{KMnO}_4 $ solution require 30 ml of 0.1 N $ \text{FeSO}_4 $ for complete reaction. This gives us a direct relationship to calculate the normality (and thus the molarity) of the $ \text{KMnO}_4 $ solution.
To find the normality of the $ \text{KMnO}_4 $ solution, we use:
$ V_1N_1 = V_2N_2 $
where,
- $ V_1 $ is the volume of $ \text{FeSO}_4 $ (30 ml),
- $ N_1 $ is the normality of $ \text{FeSO}_4 $ (0.1 N),
- $ V_2 $ is the volume of $ \text{KMnO}_4 $ (25 ml),
- $ N_2 $ is the normality of $ \text{KMnO}_4 $, which we will calculate.
$ 30 \times 0.1 = 25 \times N_2 $
$ N_2 = \frac{30 \times 0.1}{25} = \frac{3}{25} = 0.12\, \text{N} $
Now, knowing that 50 ml of $ \text{KMnO}_4 $ reacts with the $ \text{Mn}_3\text{O}_4 $ formed from the original $ \text{MnSO}_4\cdot4\text{H}_2\text{O} $, and since 25 ml of $ \text{KMnO}_4 $ is 0.12 N, 50 ml of $ \text{KMnO}_4 $ is equivalent to 60 ml of 0.1 N $ \text{FeSO}_4 $. This equivalence helps us understand the amount of $ \text{Fe}^{2+} $ that would react with the $ \text{Mn}^{2+} $ from the original sample.
Given that 60 ml of 0.1 N $ \text{FeSO}_4 $ is used in total, and knowing that 1 mole of $ \text{MnSO}_4 $ reacts to eventually form $ \text{Mn}_3\text{O}_4 $ and is equivalent to the reaction of $ \text{Fe}^{2+} $ with $ \text{KMnO}_4 $, we can calculate the moles of $ \text{MnSO}_4 $ initially present.
$ \text{Moles of } \text{Fe}^{2+} = V \times N = 60 \times 0.1 \times 10^{-3} \text{ L} \times \text{N} = 6 \times 10^{-3} \text{ moles} $
Given the molar ratio of $ \text{Fe}^{2+} $ to $ \text{MnSO}_4 $ in the reactions (which can vary based on the specific reactions involved but typically could be 1:1 in redox reactions involving manganate and iron(II) ions in acidic solution), we can assume that the moles of $ \text{Fe}^{2+} $ directly give us the moles of $ \text{MnSO}_4 $ initially present because each $ \text{Fe}^{2+} $ ion reduces a $ \text{MnO}_4^- $ ion, and the $ \text{Mn}_3\text{O}_4 $ would be linked back to the $ \text{MnSO}_4 $ based on the stoichiometry not given.
Thus, the amount of $ \text{MnSO}_4\cdot4\text{H}_2\text{O} $ present initially can be approximated if we know its molecular weight:
$ \text{MW of } \text{MnSO}_4\cdot4\text{H}_2\text{O} = 151.00 + (4 \times 18.015) = 151.00 + 72.06 = 223.06 \, \text{g/mol} $
Therefore, the mass of $ \text{MnSO}_4\cdot4\text{H}_2\text{O} $ is:
$ \text{Mass} = 6 \times 10^{-3} \text{ moles} \times 223.06 \, \text{g/mol} = 1.33836 \, \text{g} $
In this way, we find that the sample originally contains approximately $ 1.34 $ g of $ \text{MnSO}_4\cdot4\text{H}_2\text{O} $. This calculation is based on an understanding of the stoichiometry of the reactions involved and the titration data. Some assumptions had to be made due to missing precise chemical equations, especially in the conversion between $ \text{MnSO}_4\cdot4\text{H}_2\text{O} $ to $ \text{Mn}_3\text{O}_4 $, and how it reacts with $ \text{KMnO}_4 $ and $ \text{FeSO}_4 $.