uniform surface charge density ${\sigma _ + }$ and ${\sigma _ - }$,
where |${\sigma _ + }$| > |${\sigma _ - }$|, intersect at right angle.
Which of the following best represents the
electric field lines for this system :
(Curves are drawn schematically and are not to scale).
moves along X-axis with velocity V0. When it
passes through the origin it enters a region having uniform electric field
$\overrightarrow E = - E\widehat j$ which extends upto x = d.
Equation of path of electron in the region x > d is
$\overrightarrow p = \left( { - \widehat i - 3\widehat j + 2\widehat k} \right) \times {10^{ - 29}} $ C.m is
at the origin (0, 0, 0). The electric field due to this dipole at
$\overrightarrow r = + \widehat i + 3\widehat j + 5\widehat k$ (note that $\overrightarrow r .\overrightarrow p = 0$ ) is parallel to :
passes through the box shown in figure. The
flux of the electric field through surfaces ABCD
and BCGF are marked as ${\phi _I}$ and ${\phi _{II}}$
respectively. The difference between $\left( {{\phi _I} - {\phi _{II}}} \right)$ is (in Nm2/C) _______.
Explanation:
$\phi $I = $\int {\overrightarrow E } .d\overrightarrow A $ = 0
Flux via EFGH
$\phi $II = $\int {\overrightarrow E } .d\overrightarrow A $
= [$4x\widehat i - \left( {{y^2} + 1} \right)\widehat j$].4$\widehat i$
= 16x = 16 $ \times $ 3 = 48
${\phi _I} - {\phi _{II}}$ = 0 - 48 = -48 Nm2/C
Take ${q \over m}$ = 1010 Ckg−1 . Then
(Note that for three coplanar forces keeping a point mass in equilibrium, ${F \over {\sin \theta }}$ is the same for all forces, where F is any one of the forces and $\theta $ is the angle between the other two forces)
Explanation:

Ui = 0
${U_f} = {{kqp} \over {{{\left( {2l\sin {\alpha \over 2}} \right)}^2}}}$ + mgh .... (i)
Now, from $\Delta$OAB,
$\alpha$ + 90 $-$ $\theta$ + 90 $-$ $\theta$ = 180
$\Rightarrow$ $\alpha$ = 2$\theta$
From $\Delta$ABC, h = 2l sin$\left( {{\alpha \over 2}} \right)$ sin$\theta$
h = 2l sin$\left( {{\alpha \over 2}} \right)$ sin$\left( {{\alpha \over 2}} \right)$ $\Rightarrow$ h = 2l sin2$\left( {{\alpha \over 2}} \right)$
Now, charge is in equilibrium at point B.
So, using sine rule,
${{mg} \over {\sin \left( {90 + {\alpha \over 2}} \right)}} = {{qE} \over {\sin 1(80 - 2\theta )}}$
$ \Rightarrow {{mg} \over {\cos {\alpha \over 2}}} = {{qE} \over {\sin 2\theta }}$
$ \Rightarrow {{mg} \over {\cos {\alpha \over 2}}} = {{qE} \over {\sin \alpha }} \Rightarrow {{mg} \over {\cos {\alpha \over 2}}} = {{qE} \over {2\sin {\alpha \over 2}\cos {\alpha \over 2}}}$
$ \Rightarrow qE = mg2\sin \left( {{\alpha \over 2}} \right)$
$ \Rightarrow {{q2kp} \over {{{\left( {2l\sin {\alpha \over 2}} \right)}^3}}} = mg2\sin \left( {{\alpha \over 2}} \right)$
$ \Rightarrow {{kpq} \over {{{\left( {2l\sin {\alpha \over 2}} \right)}^2}}} = mg\sin \left( {{\alpha \over 2}} \right) \times \left( {2l\sin {\alpha \over 2}} \right)$
$ \Rightarrow {{kpq} \over {{{\left( {2l\sin {\alpha \over 2}} \right)}^2}}} = mgh$
Substituting this in Eq. (i), we get
${U_f} = mgh + {{kpq} \over {{{\left( {2l\sin {\alpha \over 2}} \right)}^2}}} \Rightarrow {U_f} = 2mgh$
W = $\Delta$U = 2mgh = Nmgh
$ \therefore $ N = 2
(neglect the buoyancy force, take acceleration due to gravity = 10 ms−2 and charge on an electron (e) = 1.6 $ \times $ 10–19 C)
Explanation:
$\Rightarrow q = {{mg} \over E} = \left( {{{mg} \over {V/d}}} \right)$
$ = {{900 \times {4 \over 5}\pi (8 \times {{10}^{ - 7}}) \times 10} \over {{{200} \over {0.01}}}}$
$N = {q \over e} = {{900 \times 4\pi \times {8^3} \times {{10}^{ - 21}} \times 10 \times 0.01} \over {200 \times 1.6 \times {{10}^{ - 19}}}}$
N = 6
$\sigma \left( r \right) = {\sigma _0}\left( {1 - {r \over R}} \right)$, where $\sigma $0 is a constant and r is the distance from the center of the disc. Electric flux through a large spherical surface that encloses the charged disc completely is $\phi $0. Electric flux through another spherical surface of radius ${R \over 4}$ and concentric with the disc is $\phi $. Then the ratio ${{{\phi _0}} \over \phi }$ is ________.
Explanation:
To determine the disc’s total charge, integrate the radial surface–charge distribution across its entire area:
$ \begin{aligned} q_{\text{enc}} &= \int_{0}^{a} \sigma(r)\, 2\pi r\,dr = 2\pi \sigma_{0}\int_{0}^{a}\!\left(r - \frac{r^{2}}{a}\right)dr \\[4pt] &= 2\pi \sigma_{0}\!\left[\frac{r^{2}}{2} - \frac{r^{3}}{3a}\right]_{0}^{a} = \frac{\pi \sigma_{0}a^{2}}{3}. \end{aligned} $
The electric flux through the spherical surface that encloses the entire charged disc is
$ \phi_0=\frac{q_{\mathrm{enc} 0}}{\epsilon_0}=\frac{\pi \sigma_0 a^2}{3 \epsilon_0} . $

Next, we find the flux through the smaller spherical surface of radius $a / 4$, which encloses a portion of the disc. The charge on this portion of the disc is
$ q_{\mathrm{enc}}=2 \pi \sigma_0 \int\limits_0^{a / 4}\left(r-\frac{r^2}{a}\right) \mathrm{d} r=\frac{5}{96} \pi \sigma_0 a^2 $
The flux through this spherical surface is
$ \phi=\frac{q_{\mathrm{enc}}}{\epsilon_0}=\frac{5 \pi \sigma_0 a^2}{96 \epsilon_0} $
The ratio of the two fluxes is
$ \frac{\phi_0}{\phi}=\frac{32}{5}=6.4 $
Explanation:
At l, $Fe = {F_{sp}}kl = {{2\alpha pq} \over {{l^3}}}$ (Here, $\alpha = {1 \over {4\pi {\varepsilon _0}}}$)

Now, the mass m is displaced by $\Delta $l = x from the mean position.
${F_{net}} = {F_{sp}} - Fe = k(l + x) - {{q(2\alpha p)} \over {{{(l + x)}^3}}}$
$ = k(x + 1) - {{q(2\alpha p)} \over {{l^3}{{(l + x/l)}^3}}}$
$ = kx + kl - q\left( {{{2\alpha p} \over {{l^3}}}} \right)\left( {1 - {{3x} \over l}} \right)$
$ = kx + kl - q\left( {{{2\alpha p} \over {{l^3}}}} \right) + {{2\alpha p} \over {{l^3}}}.{{3x} \over l}$
Substituting ${{2\alpha pq} \over {{l^3}}} = kl$, we get
${F_{net}} = kx + kl\left( {{{3x} \over l}} \right) = 4kx$
This is restoring in nature.
Hence, ${k_{eq}} = 4k$
or $T = 2\pi \sqrt {{m \over {4k}}} = \pi \sqrt {{m \over k}} $
$ \therefore $ $f = {1 \over \pi }\sqrt {{k \over m}} $
So, $\delta = \pi = 3.14$
The electric flux from a cube of edge $l$ is $\phi$ in an enclosed charge. If the edge of the cube is made $\frac{2}{3} l$ and the charge enclosed in the cube is doubled, then the electric flux value will be
$4 \phi$
$2 \phi$
$\frac{\phi}{2}$
$\phi$
- If the dielectric constant of a substance $K=\frac{4}{3}$, then the electric susceptibility $\chi$ in terms of vacuum permittivity $\varepsilon_0$ is
$\frac{\varepsilon_0}{3}$
$3 \varepsilon_0$
$\frac{4}{3} \varepsilon_0$
$\frac{3}{4} \varepsilon_0$
In a uniformly charged sphere of total charge $Q$ and radius $R$, the electric field $E$ is plotted as function of distance from the centre of the sphere. The graph which would correspond to the above description will be




Electric charges $+q$ and $-q$ are placed at points $A$ and $B$ respectively which are at a distance of $2 L$ apart. If $C$ is the midpoint between $A$ and $B$, then the work done in moving a charge $+Q$ along the semi-circle $C R D$ is

$\frac{q Q}{2 \pi \varepsilon_0 L}$
$\frac{q Q}{6 \pi \varepsilon_0 L}$
$-\frac{q Q}{6 \pi \varepsilon_0 L}$
$\frac{q Q}{4 \pi \varepsilon_0 L}$
Two negative charges of equal magnitude are located in $x y$-plane as shown below in the figure. The direction of the electric field at point $P$ is

along positive, $x$-direction
along negative, $x$-direction
along positive, $y$-direction
along negative, $y$-direction
An infinite non-conducting sheet has a surface charge density $2 \times 10^{-7} \mathrm{C} / \mathrm{m}^2$ on one side. The distance between two equipotential surfaces whose potential differ by 90 V is (assume, $\frac{1}{4 \pi \varepsilon_0}=9 \times 10^9 \frac{\mathrm{Nm}^2}{\mathrm{C}^2}$ )
$20 \pi \mathrm{~mm}$
$\frac{25}{\pi} \mathrm{~mm}$
$\frac{12.5}{\pi} \mathrm{~mm}$
$\frac{\pi}{20} \mathrm{~mm}$
If a proton is moved against the coulomb force of an electric field, then
work is done by the electric field
energy is used from some outside source
the strength of the field is decreased
the strength of the field is increased
If D >> d, the potential energy of the system is
best given by :
[take ${1 \over {4\pi { \in _0}}}$ = 9 $ \times $ 109 Nm2C$-$2]
Given, |${\sigma _ + }$| > |${\sigma _ - }$|






Charge enclosed in the sphere,
